It is commonly noted that the left hemisphere is specialized for language and related cognitive processes while the right hemisphere is specialized for visuospatial processes. In this proposal, we investigate the idea that specialization of function has an associated cost. As each hemisphere becomes increasingly specialized for particular functions, we hypothesize that cortical regions are co-opted for these burgeoning functions. Since these co-opted cortical regions were previously performing some other function, that function will necessarily be adversely affected by the loss of cortex devoted to it. We hypothesize that this cost will be in higher-level perceptual functions, because lower-level perceptual functions are required by both hemispheres, and should be bilaterally represented. We hypothesize that the costs associated with hemispheric specialization are predictable. It has been hypothesized that the development of language in the left hemisphere is predicated on its relative superiority for temporal and sequential processing. We argue that this asymmetry """"""""snowballed"""""""" over the course of human evolution, resulting in increasing specialization for timing and sequencing in the left hemisphere. This, in turn, resulted in a loss of visuospatial grain in the left hemisphere as tissue previously devoted to this function was co-opted for language. Relieved of the necessity of making such discriminations, we hypothesize that cortical resources previously dedicated to temporal processing in the right hemisphere were co-opted for fine-grained perceptual processing, effectively trading off temporal for spatial resolution. We propose to investigate the pattern of hemispheric specializations for perceptual abilities and their associated processing costs. Callosotomy (""""""""split-brain"""""""") patients provide a unique opportunity to investigate the perceptual processes of each hemisphere in isolation. Although the notion of hemispheric specialization is not a new one, the idea that specialization has associated costs has implications for theories of brain function and for evolutionary theories of brain development.
| Roser, Matthew E; Fiser, Jozsef; Aslin, Richard N et al. (2011) Right hemisphere dominance in visual statistical learning. J Cogn Neurosci 23:1088-99 |
| Roser, Matthew E; Fugelsang, Jonathan A; Handy, Todd C et al. (2009) Representations of physical plausibility revealed by event-related potentials. Neuroreport 20:1081-6 |
| Funnell, Margaret G; Colvin, Mary K; Gazzaniga, Michael S (2007) The calculating hemispheres: studies of a split-brain patient. Neuropsychologia 45:2378-86 |
| Roser, Matthew E; Fugelsang, Jonathan A; Dunbar, Kevin N et al. (2005) Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology 19:591-602 |
| Colvin, Mary K; Funnell, Margaret G; Gazzaniga, Michael S (2005) Numerical processing in the two hemispheres: studies of a split-brain patient. Brain Cogn 57:43-52 |
| Frey, Scott H; Funnell, Margaret G; Gerry, Valerie E et al. (2005) A dissociation between the representation of tool-use skills and hand dominance: insights from left- and right-handed callosotomy patients. J Cogn Neurosci 17:262-72 |
| Corballis, Paul M (2003) Visuospatial processing and the right-hemisphere interpreter. Brain Cogn 53:171-6 |
| Funnell, Margaret G; Corballis, Paul M; Gazzaniga, Michael S (2003) Temporal discrimination in the split brain. Brain Cogn 53:218-22 |
| Corballis, Paul M; Funnell, Margaret G; Gazzaniga, Michael S (2002) An investigation of the line motion effect in a callosotomy patient. Brain Cogn 48:327-32 |
| Corballis, Paul M; Funnell, Margaret G; Gazzaniga, Michael S (2002) Hemispheric asymmetries for simple visual judgments in the split brain. Neuropsychologia 40:401-10 |
Showing the most recent 10 out of 12 publications
