Impaired cognitive functioning in people with severe mental illness (SMI) is an important illness-related factor that limits their ability to benefit frm supported employment (SE), an evidence- based practice for improving competitive work in this population. The Thinking Skills for Work (TSW) program is a cognitive remediation program, including computer-based cognitive exercises and teaching compensatory strategies for managing cognitive difficulties, that was designed to be integrated with vocational rehabilitation services, including SE. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the TSW program provided to consumers with cognitive impairment receiving SE services, including one study from the parent R01 that the current application is a competing renewal for, have shown that TSW significantly improves cognitive functioning and competitive work compared to when SE services alone are provided. However, before widespread dissemination of the TSW program can occur, it is important to evaluate whether a more streamlined and efficient version of the program is equally effective, or whether some consumers require the full TSW program whereas others benefit equally from the briefer version. The most time consuming part of TSW is the computer-based cognitive exercises, yet it is unknown whether simply teaching strategies for compensating for cognitive difficulties is sufficient for overcoming the effects of cognitive impairment on work outcomes. This competing renewal is aimed at addressing this question. The proposed research will examine the importance of the cognitive exercises in the TSW program by comparing it to a briefer version of the program (the Cognitive Skills for Work (CSW) program) that omits this component (45-65 hours for TSW vs. 20-30 hours, for CSW). To compare the effectiveness of the TSW program with the streamlined CSW program, we propose to conduct a RCT at the same two sites and SE programs as our parent R01. We will randomize 200 unemployed consumers with cognitive impairment who are receiving SE to one of two programs: TSW or CSW. All consumers will continue to receive SE services throughout the study period. Cognitive and clinical assessments will be conducted at baseline, post-cognitive training, and 1- and 2-year post-randomization. Work will be tracked weekly for the 2-year study period. The results of this study could lead to a more efficient version of the TSW program (the CSW program), thereby facilitating its dissemination. The findings could also result in the identification of which consumers most benefit from the full TSW program (e.g., such as those with more severe cognitive impairments, or with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders) and which consumers benefit equally from the streamlined CSW program (e.g., consumers with less impaired cognitive functioning, or with other diagnoses). This research has significant promise for reducing the disability, costs, poor quality of life, and social stigma associated with unemployment in SMI; for increasing the potency of SE, the only evidence- based practice for improving work in this population; and for making the dream of competitive work a real possibility for consumers with cognitive impairment.

Public Health Relevance

Cognitive impairment in people with severe mental illness is a major obstacle to obtaining and keeping competitive jobs in supported employment programs, an evidence-based practice for improving work outcomes. The Thinking Skills for Work is a cognitive remediation program, including both computer- based cognitive exercises and teaching compensatory strategies, that has been demonstrated in two randomized controlled trials to improve cognitive functioning and competitive work in consumers with cognitive impairment receiving supported employment, compared to supported employment alone. The goal of this project is to evaluate whether a streamlined version of the Thinking Skills for Work program, requiring approximately one-half the time to implement, is just as effective as the full program, for some or all consumers. The findings could lead to a more efficient cognitive remediation program designed to enhance the effectiveness of supported employment that could facilitate its widespread dissemination, and the identification of which consumers benefit most from the full Thinking Skills for Work program compared to the streamlined version, thereby personalizing the delivery of cognitive remediation. The ultimate goal of this research is to help consumers with cognitive impairment achieve their dreams of competitive work in the community.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
3R01MH077210-08S1
Application #
9076725
Study Section
Program Officer
Juliano-Bult, Denise M
Project Start
2015-09-04
Project End
2017-04-30
Budget Start
2015-09-04
Budget End
2016-04-30
Support Year
8
Fiscal Year
2015
Total Cost
$128,527
Indirect Cost
$33,230
Name
Boston University
Department
Other Health Professions
Type
Schools of Allied Health Profes
DUNS #
049435266
City
Boston
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02215
Mueser, Kim T; Kim, Min; Addington, Jean et al. (2017) Confirmatory factor analysis of the quality of life scale and new proposed factor structure for the quality of life scale-revised. Schizophr Res 181:117-123
McGurk, Susan R; Mueser, Kim T; Xie, Haiyi et al. (2015) Cognitive Enhancement Treatment for People With Mental Illness Who Do Not Respond to Supported Employment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry 172:852-61
Mueser, K T; McGurk, S R (2014) Supported employment for persons with serious mental illness: current status and future directions. Encephale 40 Suppl 2:S45-56
Teague, Gregory B; Mueser, Kim T; Rapp, Charles A (2012) Advances in fidelity measurement for mental health services research: four measures. Psychiatr Serv 63:765-71
Kurtz, Matthew M; Mueser, Kim T (2008) A meta-analysis of controlled research on social skills training for schizophrenia. J Consult Clin Psychol 76:491-504
McGurk, Susan R; Twamley, Elizabeth W; Sitzer, David I et al. (2007) A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 164:1791-802