Large-scale networks of the human brain can be measured non-invasively using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). While most previous work has focused on group descriptions of functional networks, recent findings suggest that the study of highly-sampled single participants can reveal novel aspects of brain organization specific to an individual. Here, we focus on atypical locations where an individual?s functional networks do not match the group, which we call network variants. Preliminary data demonstrates that network variants are present across all individuals, but differ in location, number, and network assignment. Variants are most often associated with systems of the brain linked to goal-directed ?controlled? processing. This observation is intriguing, given that individual differences in control functions are known to be large and heritable, and in extreme cases can be central contributions to pathology in disorders such as schizophrenia. Based on these preliminary findings, we develop a model, wherein we suggest that stable factors (e.g., genetics, long-term experience) reprioritize the functions of cortical areas, leading to the creation of network variants, altered task activations, and behavior. Our goal is to test this model by examining the sources and consequences of variants. Given that variants are most associated with regions related to controlled tasks, we focus our tests on control- related activations and behavior. We will test the following hypotheses:
(Aim 1) variants represent stable, heritable, endophenotypes for individual differences in brain organization, (Aim 2) variants relate to individual differences in brain activations in control tasks, and (Aim 3) variants relate to individual differences in behavior in control tasks.
In Aim 1 we propose addressing the trait-like nature of variants by measuring variant stability across states, and the similarity of variant patterns across unrelated individuals, mono-, and dizygotic twins.
In Aim 2, we propose using a precision fMRI approach to measure variant activations across a range of control- related task contexts. Finally, in Aim 3 we propose examining whether variants are related to differences in control-related behavior. This proposal is innovative: it adopts cutting-edge methods for reliably characterizing networks in single individuals to study atypical components of brain networks (rather than group descriptions) and provides a new window into possible mechanisms underlying individual differences in brain organization, activations, and behavior. This proposal will impact (1) basic science, by expanding our understanding of individual variability in brain networks and their relationship to brain function and behavior, and (2) translational research, by laying groundwork for the study of extreme forms of individual differences in control found in psychopathology, potentially with future utility in personalized medicine. Thus, this proposal addresses RDoC goals by investigating (1) individual differences at multiple levels (brain organization, physiology, and behavior), (2) genetic and environmental sources for individual differences, and (3) potential biomarkers of dimensional individual differences linked to psychopathology.
Recent findings have demonstrated that individuals show specific, local differences in their brain network organization, locations we call ?network variants?; however, the sources and consequences of these differences are not yet known. This proposal addresses these critical questions, testing the hypotheses that network variants are stable, heritable traits, and that they affect brain function and behavior. Thus, this proposal is relevant to (1) a basic scientific understanding of the links between individual differences in brain function and behavior, and (2) translational work that relies on measuring sources of individual differences in cognitive control that may be relevant to psychiatric disorders.
