Humans and higher animals receive much more information from their sensory periphery than they can process in detail by their central nervous system. Selective attention is the triage process by which incoming information is divided into the behaviorally most relevant parts, which require detailed processing, and all others that are suppressed. The goal of this research is to understand the neural mechanisms underlying tactile selective attention which will be studied by single unit recordings and local field potential recordings in awake behaving monkeys.
The first Aim i s to determine the limits of granularity of attentional selection. What are the limits of selection in space (attend to different fingers or to different hands), submodality (attend to vibration or to form) and time (changes within the duration of one trial), and what are the neuronal correlations of this attentional selection? We will specifically measure changes in mean firing rate and in correlations between neurons (synchrony).
Aim 2 is to determine the influence of attentional selection on the responses of identified neuronal subpopulations, including the functional populations defined by the cortical layers and by the postsynaptic effects of neurons (excitation or inhibition). We will also determine whether all neurons showing synchrony are part of one population or whether there are several subpopulations whose members are synchronous with each other but not with members of other subpopulations. Two theoretical models of the role of neural synchrony in perception (1: tagging of the attended stimulus, 2: tagging of different parts of a perceived stimulus) make different predictions for the number of subpopulations and this analysis will test those predictions.
Aim 3 is to study the mechanisms underlying the generation of synchrony. One hypothesis that will be tested is phase locking of action potentials to a periodic function (oscillations).

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01NS043188-01A1
Application #
6723447
Study Section
Integrative, Functional and Cognitive Neuroscience 8 (IFCN)
Program Officer
Babcock, Debra J
Project Start
2004-01-01
Project End
2007-12-31
Budget Start
2004-01-01
Budget End
2004-12-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2004
Total Cost
$329,881
Indirect Cost
Name
Johns Hopkins University
Department
Neurosciences
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
001910777
City
Baltimore
State
MD
Country
United States
Zip Code
21218
Mihala?, Stefan; Niebur, Ernst (2009) A generalized linear integrate-and-fire neural model produces diverse spiking behaviors. Neural Comput 21:704-18
Ray, Supratim; Crone, Nathan E; Niebur, Ernst et al. (2008) Neural correlates of high-gamma oscillations (60-200 Hz) in macaque local field potentials and their potential implications in electrocorticography. J Neurosci 28:11526-36
Ray, Supratim; Hsiao, Steven S; Crone, Nathan E et al. (2008) Effect of stimulus intensity on the spike-local field potential relationship in the secondary somatosensory cortex. J Neurosci 28:7334-43
Ray, Supratim; Niebur, Ernst; Hsiao, Steven S et al. (2008) High-frequency gamma activity (80-150Hz) is increased in human cortex during selective attention. Clin Neurophysiol 119:116-33
Roy, A; Steinmetz, P N; Hsiao, S S et al. (2007) Synchrony: a neural correlate of somatosensory attention. J Neurophysiol 98:1645-61
Niebur, Ernst (2007) Generation of synthetic spike trains with defined pairwise correlations. Neural Comput 19:1720-38
Mikula, Shawn; Niebur, Ernst (2006) A novel method for visualizing functional connectivity using principal component analysis. Int J Neurosci 116:419-29
Mikula, Shawn; Niebur, Ernst (2005) Rate and synchrony in feedforward networks of coincidence detectors: analytical solution. Neural Comput 17:881-902
Shimazaki, Hideaki; Niebur, Ernst (2005) Phase transitions in multiplicative competitive processes. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 72:011912
Mikula, Shawn; Niebur, Ernst (2004) Correlated inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the coincidence detector: analytical solution. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 15:957-62