Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) has been proposed as a middle ground between normal aging and dementia, and this concept holds promise for the early identification and treatment of individuals likely to develop Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 limitation of the predictive value of this concept is that only a fraction of individuals with MCI go on to develop AD each year (approximately 12%). If the individuals who convert from MCI to AD were more easily identified, then clinical trials could be more efficiently conducted. Since no specific biomedical/psychometric marker is available that identifies these potential converters, the present study seeks to utilize a novel paradigm to identify these individuals who are at greater risk to convert to AD. 1 goal of this project is to determine the relative magnitude of practice effects (i.e., increased cognitive test performance due to repeated exposure to test materials) among elderly individuals with no cognitive impairments (NCI) or MCI. Recently, practice effects have been shown to be useful in detecting MCI, and a logical extension of these findings is to evaluate their ability to predict decline in MCI. Therefore, a second goal is to determine the relative value of practice effects in predicting future cognitive functioning. Specifically, we propose a longitudinal observational study in elderly subjects with NCI or MCI. All participants will receive a baseline assessment of cognitive functioning, which will be immediately repeated to assess practice effects. It is expected that participants with NCI will demonstrate larger practice effects than participants with MCI. It is also expected that within the MCI group, some individuals will display relatively larger practice effects and some will display smaller practice effects. Follow-up cognitive evaluations will be conducted on all participants at 6- and 12-months. It is hypothesized that the amount of practice demonstrated during the baseline phase will be inversely related to the amount of cognitive decline on follow-up, which could lead to earlier identification of cognitive decline.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Small Research Grants (R03)
Project #
5R03AG025850-02
Application #
7092099
Study Section
Adult Psychopathology and Disorders of Aging Study Section (APDA)
Program Officer
Buckholtz, Neil
Project Start
2005-07-15
Project End
2009-05-31
Budget Start
2006-06-01
Budget End
2009-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$59,053
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Iowa
Department
Psychology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
062761671
City
Iowa City
State
IA
Country
United States
Zip Code
52242
Duff, Kevin; Beglinger, Leigh J; Moser, David J et al. (2010) Predicting cognitive change in older adults: the relative contribution of practice effects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 25:81-8
Duff, Kevin; Beglinger, Leigh J; Moser, David J et al. (2010) Predicting cognitive change within domains. Clin Neuropsychol 24:779-92
Duff, Kevin; Hobson, Valerie L; Beglinger, Leigh J et al. (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of the RBANS in mild cognitive impairment: limitations on assessing milder impairments. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 25:429-41
Duff, Kevin (2010) Predicting premorbid memory functioning in older adults. Appl Neuropsychol 17:278-82
Beglinger, Leigh J; Duff, Kevin; Moser, David J et al. (2009) The Indiana faces in places test: preliminary findings on a new visuospatial memory test in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 24:607-18
Duff, Kevin; Beglinger, Leigh J; Adams, William H (2009) Validation of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and intact elders. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 23:38-43
Duff, Kevin; Beglinger, Leigh J; Van Der Heiden, Sara et al. (2008) Short-term practice effects in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Int Psychogeriatr 20:986-99
Duff, Kevin; Beglinger, Leigh J; Schultz, Susan K et al. (2007) Practice effects in the prediction of long-term cognitive outcome in three patient samples: a novel prognostic index. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 22:15-24