? Understanding how a child comes to identify individual words within fluent speech is crucial to understanding first language development. Fundamentally, language learning requires both recognition and segmentation skills. If infants cannot break input utterances into constituent components and determine whether the resulting auditory objects are exemplars of particular linguistic types, it will be impossible for them to learn what individual components mean and how these parts fit together. The representational units (e.g., words) serve as the basis upon which infants develop syntactic and semantic knowledge. By coupling a traditional infant speech perception procedure with an established form of optical neuroimaging, the research proposed in this application will provide researchers with a new tool for interpreting behavioral data from very young infants. The objective of this application is to identify neural correlates of lexical representations in infants of different ages using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS). Groups of infants--aged 5.5 months and 10 months--will be tested using a modified preferential listening procedure while wearing a set of custom optical imaging probes and detectors on their heads.
The specific aims of this study are to (1) construct localized maps of neural activity for groups of infants displaying familiarity and novelty listening preferences, and (2) differentiate between semantic and episodic auditory memory in young infants. The central hypothesis for the proposed research is that optical neuroimaging will reveal that infants have more nuanced representations of words than behaviorally conveyed familiarity and novelty effects can demonstrate. The outcome of these studies will be used to advance theories of infant language learning. These theories will further our understanding of both normal and abnormal language development. ? ?

National Institute of Health (NIH)
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Small Research Grants (R03)
Project #
Application #
Study Section
Pediatrics Subcommittee (CHHD)
Program Officer
Mccardle, Peggy D
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
Fiscal Year
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Texas A&M University
Schools of Arts and Sciences
College Station
United States
Zip Code
Baart, Martijn; Vroomen, Jean; Shaw, Kathleen et al. (2014) Degrading phonetic information affects matching of audiovisual speech in adults, but not in infants. Cognition 130:31-43
Fava, Eswen; Hull, Rachel; Baumbauer, Kyle et al. (2014) Hemodynamic responses to speech and music in preverbal infants. Child Neuropsychol 20:430-48
Chen, Hsin-Chin; Vaid, Jyotsna; Boas, David A et al. (2011) Examining the phonological neighborhood density effect using near infrared spectroscopy. Hum Brain Mapp 32:1363-70
Bortfeld, Heather; Morgan, James L (2010) Is early word-form processing stress-full? How natural variability supports recognition. Cogn Psychol 60:241-66
Bortfeld, Heather; Fava, Eswen; Boas, David A (2009) Identifying cortical lateralization of speech processing in infants using near-infrared spectroscopy. Dev Neuropsychol 34:52-65
Felps, Daniel; Bortfeld, Heather; Gutierrez-Osuna, Ricardo (2009) Foreign accent conversion in computer assisted pronunciation training. Speech Commun 51:920-932
Wilcox, Teresa; Bortfeld, Heather; Woods, Rebecca et al. (2009) Hemodynamic changes in the infant cortex during the processing of featural and spatiotemporal information. Neuropsychologia 47:657-62
Rodríguez, Jobany; Bortfeld, Heather; Rudomín, Isaac et al. (2009) The Reverse-Caricature Effect Revisited: Familiarization With Frontal Facial Caricatures Improves Veridical Face Recognition. Appl Cogn Psychol 23:733-742
Wilcox, Teresa; Bortfeld, Heather; Woods, Rebecca et al. (2008) Hemodynamic response to featural changes in the occipital and inferior temporal cortex in infants: a preliminary methodological exploration. Dev Sci 11:361-70
Chen, Hsin-Chin; Vaid, Jyotsna; Bortfeld, Heather et al. (2008) Optical imaging of phonological processing in two distinct orthographies. Exp Brain Res 184:427-33

Showing the most recent 10 out of 13 publications