Pharmaceutical drug discovery costs a tremendous amount of time and money. Now roughly $1 billion goes into bringing each new drug to market, on average . An important factor in this cost is the amount of trial and error involved in finding initial """"""""hits"""""""" which modulate the function of a biomolecule, and then refining these into """"""""leads"""""""" which have adequate affinity for the biomolecular target and other desirable properties. Ideally, computational methods would drastically reduce the amount of trial and error involved, suggesting hits in advance of experiment, and guiding the refinement process by predicting chemical changes to improve affinity while maintaining drug-like properties. Current computational methods are not reliable enough to facilitate this radical change in the drug discovery process. This proposal applies the PI's recent innovations in predicting binding affinities based on computer simulations to several different systems of increasing biological relevance, [and proposes further innovations in orientational, conformational, and sidechain sampling]. This will result in further improvements in the approach, [and tests of its accuracy], bringing it closer to the point where it will be applied in a drug discovery context. The proposed approach uses """"""""alchemical"""""""" absolute free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. This is one of the most physically realistic approaches available, and one of the most promising in terms of accuracy. This project's aims are to (1) improve the accuracy of binding free energy techniques in a polar model binding site in T4 lysozyme, using alchemical techniques with new algorithms to overcome sampling problems;[(2) predict binding affinities of trypsin inhibitors in a blind test, following this up with substantial analysis and additional calculations;and (3) compute binding affinities of an extensive set of DNA gyrase inhibitors, testing against experimental data and rationalizing observed trends.] In each of these projects, we will compute absolute [or relative] binding affinities for each potential inhibitor studied, beginning from a set of possible binding modes generated by docking potential inhibitors into one existing unbound structure of the protein. Using this set of possible binding modes as starting points for simulation means that bound structures of the individual inhibitors do not need to be known in advance for accuracy. Ultimately, this work will pay off in improved methods for affinity calculation. These will be applied to problems in drug discovery once the accuracy, speed, and reliability are sufficiently high. This work will play a key role in achieving necessary levels of accuracy and reliability.
Pharmaceutical drug discovery produces dramatic public health benefits through new and improved treatments for common diseases and disorders, but it is an expensive, time-consuming process involving much trial and error, and failure is common. This proposal refines and applies computer simulation techniques to predicting association between proteins, life's molecular machines, and potential pharmaceutical agents. This work has the potential to drastically change the early stages of the drug discovery process, aiding the development of new drugs and paying public health rewards!
|Liu, Shuai; Cao, Shannon; Hoang, Kevin et al. (2016) Using MD Simulations To Calculate How Solvents Modulate Solubility. J Chem Theory Comput 12:1930-41|
|Paluch, Andrew S; Parameswaran, Sreeja; Liu, Shuai et al. (2015) Predicting the excess solubility of acetanilide, acetaminophen, phenacetin, benzocaine, and caffeine in binary water/ethanol mixtures via molecular simulation. J Chem Phys 142:044508|
|Klimovich, Pavel V; Shirts, Michael R; Mobley, David L (2015) Guidelines for the analysis of free energy calculations. J Comput Aided Mol Des 29:397-411|
|Mobley, David L; Bayly, Christopher I; Cooper, Matthew D et al. (2015) Correction to Small Molecule Hydration Free Energies in Explicit Solvent: An Extensive Test of Fixed-Charge Atomistic Simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 11:1347|
|Klimovich, Pavel V; Mobley, David L (2015) A Python tool to set up relative free energy calculations in GROMACS. J Comput Aided Mol Des 29:1007-14|
|Liu, Shuai; Wang, Lingle; Mobley, David L (2015) Is ring breaking feasible in relative binding free energy calculations? J Chem Inf Model 55:727-35|
|Mobley, David L; Wymer, Karisa L; Lim, Nathan M et al. (2014) Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge. J Comput Aided Mol Des 28:135-50|
|Fennell, Christopher J; Wymer, Karisa L; Mobley, David L (2014) A fixed-charge model for alcohol polarization in the condensed phase, and its role in small molecule hydration. J Phys Chem B 118:6438-46|
|Muddana, Hari S; Fenley, Andrew T; Mobley, David L et al. (2014) The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview. J Comput Aided Mol Des 28:305-17|
|Peat, Thomas S; Dolezal, Olan; Newman, Janet et al. (2014) Interrogating HIV integrase for compounds that bind--a SAMPL challenge. J Comput Aided Mol Des 28:347-62|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 19 publications