: Despite the fact that asthma and allergy represent the most common conditions for which pregnant women take prescription medications, there is no systematic approach to evaluating the relative risks and safety of these medications with respect to pregnancy outcomes. Such information is critically needed for prescribers to make meaningful risk benefit assessments of these widely used medications and for patients to feel comfortable that the potential adverse effects associated with the drugs prescribed for them have been adequately studied. To fill this critical gap in clinical knowledge, we propose to demonstrate the feasibility of a comprehensive and ongoing system to assess the relative safety of asthma medications in pregnancy. This specific application will demonstrate the feasibility of using an established cohort pregnancy outcome study design (Organization of Teratology Information Specialists or OTIS), to generate and test hypotheses related to the comparative risk (or safety) for birth defects overall, preterm delivery, small-for-gestational age infants, and perinatal complications associated with recently introduced asthma medications for which there is little to no current data. In addition, this demonstration project will integrate the findings of the cohort study with data derived from a parallel and complementary case-control demonstration application submitted by the Slone Epidemiology Center's Birth Defects Study. Finally, this demonstration project will work in close collaboration with the American Academy of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology (AAAAI) to develop the infrastructure for an ongoing comparative pregnancy safety system. This will include an expert independent advisory committee to evaluate the accumulating data from the OTIS cohort study as well as case-control data, and to offer recommendations regarding relative risk and safety of asthma medications in pregnancy. These three activities taken together will further demonstrate the feasibility of the system for studying comparative safety of other recently marketed and/or commonly used medications in pregnancy.
Despite the fact that asthma and allergy represent the most common conditions for which pregnant women take prescription medications, there is no systematic approach to evaluating the relative risks and safety of these medications with respect to pregnancy outcomes. The OTIS Collaborative Research Group proposes in this demonstration project to test the feasibility of such a system by conducting a cohort study of 600 pregnancies comparing outcomes among asthmatic women who take the newly marketed long-acting beta2 agonists with or without inhaled corticosteroids to asthmatic women who are treated only with the older short-acting beta2 agonists as well as non- asthmatic women who take no such medication. With the collaboration of the American Academy of Asthma Allergy and Immunology, we will integrate our work with a parallel proposed demonstration project using case-control methodology, and will develop the infrastructure for oversight by an independent advisory committee.
|Palmsten, Kristin; Hulugalle, Avanthi; Bandoli, Gretchen et al. (2018) Agreement Between Maternal Report and Medical Records During Pregnancy: Medications for Rheumatoid Arthritis and Asthma. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 32:68-77|
|Palmsten, Kristin; Schatz, Michael; Chan, Priscilla H et al. (2016) Validation of the Pregnancy Asthma Control Test. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 4:310-5.e1|