Translational stress research has aimed to elucidate the biological mechanisms through which psychological stress influences disease pathophysiology in humans. Advancement in this field has been challenged by a technology gap that forces researchers to employ either comprehensive but invasive methods (e.g., genomic profiling after venipuncture) or minimally-invasive but non-comprehensive methods (e.g., salivary assays).
AIM. We aim to validate a comprehensive and minimally-invasive method to study stress biology in humans, by testing whether minimally-invasive blood collection methods, namely dried blood spots and capillary blood collection, could be used to detect stress-related changes in genome-wide expression patterns. METHODS. First, for laboratory validation, we will collect RNA from dried blood spots, capillary blood, and venous blood in 10 healthy volunteers. We will then test the reliability, the validity, and the sensitivity of genomic profiles from minimally-invasive specimen-collection procedures. These tests will inform the choice of dried blood spots or capillary blood for specimen collection in a clinical validation. Second, for clinical validation, we will ask a population-representative sample of 1,250 pairs of 16-year-old UK monozygotic twins followed-up by the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS) to complete a computerized version of the Perceived Stress Scale and we will select the 35 most discordant twin pairs on this measure. We will then test whether microarray analysis from minimally-invasive assays can identify gene expression differences in pairs of young individuals with identical DNA sequences but different exposure to stress. IMPLICATIONS. The validation of a minimally-invasive assay to study the genomic fingerprint of stress will provide researchers with the technology needed to perform comprehensive assessment of stress biology in larger, more population-representative, and younger human samples.

Public Health Relevance

A critical barrier to the advancement of translational stress research is the lack of minimally-invasive and comprehensive methods to assess stress-related biological changes in humans. We propose to carry out the validation of a safe, simple and comparatively painless procedure to study stress-related changes in genome-wide expression patterns. This project will provide researchers with the technology needed to perform comprehensive assessment of stress biology in larger, younger and more population-representative human samples.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Type
Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21)
Project #
5R21HL109396-02
Application #
8315716
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-BBBP-J (51))
Program Officer
Stoney, Catherine
Project Start
2011-08-15
Project End
2014-07-31
Budget Start
2012-08-01
Budget End
2014-07-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2012
Total Cost
$155,745
Indirect Cost
$11,537
Name
King's College London
Department
Type
DUNS #
231876178
City
London
State
Country
United Kingdom
Zip Code
WC2 -2LS
Agnew-Blais, Jessica; Danese, Andrea (2016) Childhood maltreatment and unfavourable clinical outcomes in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 3:342-9
Danese, A; Tan, M (2014) Childhood maltreatment and obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 19:544-54
Danese, A; Dove, R; Belsky, D W et al. (2014) Leptin deficiency in maltreated children. Transl Psychiatry 4:e446