One of the core symptoms of many anxiety disorders, especially Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), is an inability for fear safe in situations where healthy individuals do feel safe. Thus, animal models of fear conditioning and fear inhibition offer useful tools to determine how these learned fears are diminished or inhibited. We have developed a new paradigm in rodents referred to as AX?, where cues A and X in compound signal an aversive event and cues B and X in compound signal no aversive event (safety). In a critical subsequent transfer test trial, presentation of A and B together (AB) results in a reduced fear response compared with the response to A. Other tests have shown this is bona fide conditioning inhibition and not due to external inhibition. We have now found this to be true in humans and rhesus monkeys where we see transfer of inhibition on AB test trials, in contrast to prior failures to see transfer in humans using the typical conditioned inhibition paradigm. Most importantly, in three independent groups of patients with PTSD we see some discrimination between AX and BX but no transfer on the critical AB test trial, thus detecting a core symptom in PTSD. The R21 phase of this application is to modify our current AX? paradigm into a """"""""working memory"""""""" test, which will allow the same monkeys to be tested repeatedly in this new paradigm using sets of pictures as stimuli instead of lights and tones. We will then evaluate in adult monkeys that have sustained neurotoxic lesions of orbital frontal areas 14/25 vs.11/13 vs. 12 in safety signal learning and expression. As a positive control, we will also test these monkeys in reversal learning and reinforce devaluation that is known to be compromised by damage to one or more of these lesions. If successful, the R33 phase will begin to evaluate the development of safety signal learning from year 1 to year 3, a time period when pronounced developmental changes occur in these orbital frontal areas. We believe a """"""""working memory"""""""" version of this measure of safety signal learning in which the same animal can be tested repeatedly will provide a major new paradigm to study safety signal learning in psychiatric disorders and to eventually lead to new and better treatments for people with anxiety disorders. This project is clinically relevant because: (1) many emotional disorders in humans, such as anxiety, phobias and post-traumatic stress disorders, are characterized by a resistance to extinguish learned emotional reactions to anxiogenic stimuli or contextual information associated with these anxiogenic stimuli, (2) learned fear in early infancy has strong resistance to extinction that yield anxiety disorders later in life and (3) anxiety disorders have also been reported in several developmental neuropsychiatric disorders, such as autism and schizophrenia, as well as following pediatric traumatic brain injury and early life stress.
Excessive fear and anxiety, along with an inability to overcome these emotions, are defining characteristics of many psychiatric disorders, such as phobias, panic disorder, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Animal models of fear conditioning and fear inhibition are thus needed to provide useful tools for the study of these phenomena. Data have already suggested that the orbital frontal cortex play a critical role in the regulation of behavioral inhibition and that its dysfunction is associated with anxiety disorders. In addition, the orbital frontal cortex has a progressive development until young adulthood and is extremely sensitive to a wide variety of perturbations in early infancy. Given the sensitivity of this brain region to environmental factors in early infancy and given that fear acquired early in development may be particularly resistant to the effects of extinction, resulting in anxiety disorders emerging later on in life, studies investigating the development of fear extinction and its regulation by the orbital frontal cortex must be a high priority in the search for ways to treat or prevent these disorders in the adults and during development. We believe that the paradigm that will developed in the proposed studies will establish a new and important translational approach to eventually develop novel treatments for disorders. There is no other paradigm we know of in which identical procedures using the same output measure (startle amplitude) can be measured in rats, monkeys and humans, all of which are currently on going in the Davis's lab (rats), Duncan's lab (humans) and now in the Bachevalier's lab, all at Emory. This paradigm will thus allow us, and the field, to look at the anatomy, neurotransmitters, and molecular events that mediate and modulate safety signal learning in rodents that can be used to develop specific hypotheses that can then be tested in rhesus monkeys and humans.
|Kazama, Andy M; Schauder, Kimberly B; McKinnon, Michael et al. (2013) A novel AX+/BX- paradigm to assess fear learning and safety-signal processing with repeated-measure designs. J Neurosci Methods 214:177-83|
|Jovanovic, Tanja; Kazama, Andrew; Bachevalier, Jocelyne et al. (2012) Impaired safety signal learning may be a biomarker of PTSD. Neuropharmacology 62:695-704|
|Kazama, Andy M; Heuer, Eric; Davis, Michael et al. (2012) Effects of neonatal amygdala lesions on fear learning, conditioned inhibition, and extinction in adult macaques. Behav Neurosci 126:392-403|
|Christianson, John P; Fernando, Anushka B P; Kazama, Andy M et al. (2012) Inhibition of fear by learned safety signals: a mini-symposium review. J Neurosci 32:14118-24|