Parents of children with incurable cancer face end-of-life decisions on behalf of their seriously ill child including whether or not to enroll their child in a Phase I study, to make their child a 'do not resuscitate' status, to begin terminal care, or to withdraw life support. Descriptive research to date indicates that one of the factors that most helps parents to make these decisions and to remain satisfied with the decision afterward is their perception that they decided as a 'good parent' would decide. Parents define being a 'good parent' as making a decision that is in the best interest of their child. Parents' perception of their success of being 'a good parent' is influenced by their interactions with the child's health care providers. Health care providers who are not fully informed about the decision and the parents' rationale for the decision are likely to convey doubt about the decision to parents and to other health care providers. Parents interpret this doubt as staff questioning the parents' ability to make good decisions. Lack of adequate information also creates staff tension. This single-site feasibility study will implement and evaluate a two-part communication intervention designed to identify and support parents' perceptions of being a good parent and to communicate this definition and the rationale for the parents' decision to staff. The intervention will be implemented in 60 to 80 end-of-life clinical care situations where parents have made a decision on behalf of a child who is still living. The feasibility study is guided by the Pediatric Quality of Life at End of Life model. The parent intervention includes a face-to-face interview with parents regarding their definition of a 'good parent' and their basis for the decision they made. Parents will be interviewed within 72 hours after making the end of life decision and again 8 to 12 weeks after their child's death. Health care professionals assigned to the terminally ill child will receive the communication intervention within hours of the parent interview, and will evaluate its usefulness 1 to 2 weeks after receiving it. Study findings will provide the basis for a trial of the efficacy of the intervention in decreasing parents' self-doubt and staff tension about end-of-life decisions on behalf of dying children.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Type
Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21)
Project #
1R21NR008634-01
Application #
6687636
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZNR1-REV-A (52))
Program Officer
Bakos, Alexis D
Project Start
2003-08-01
Project End
2006-07-31
Budget Start
2003-08-01
Budget End
2004-07-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2003
Total Cost
$187,500
Indirect Cost
Name
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Department
Type
DUNS #
067717892
City
Memphis
State
TN
Country
United States
Zip Code
38105
Hinds, Pamela S; Oakes, Linda L; Hicks, Judy et al. (2012) Parent-clinician communication intervention during end-of-life decision making for children with incurable cancer. J Palliat Med 15:916-22
Maurer, Scott H; Hinds, Pamela S; Spunt, Sheri L et al. (2010) Decision making by parents of children with incurable cancer who opt for enrollment on a phase I trial compared with choosing a do not resuscitate/terminal care option. J Clin Oncol 28:3292-8
Hinds, Pamela S; Kelly, Katherine Patterson (2010) Helping parents make and survive end of life decisions for their seriously ill child. Nurs Clin North Am 45:465-74
Hinds, Pamela S; Oakes, Linda L; Hicks, Judy et al. (2009) ""Trying to be a good parent"" as defined by interviews with parents who made phase I, terminal care, and resuscitation decisions for their children. J Clin Oncol 27:5979-85
Hinds, Pamela S; Burghen, Elizabeth A; Pritchard, Michele (2007) Conducting end-of-life studies in pediatric oncology. West J Nurs Res 29:448-65
Harper, Joann; Hinds, Pamela S; Baker, Justin N et al. (2007) Creating a palliative and end-of-life program in a cure-oriented pediatric setting: the zig-zag method. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 24:246-54