A two-phase study is planned to validate whether functional breast imaging with a dedicated breast PET device could detect and confirm breast cancer multifocality and/or multicentricity prior to surgery. Surgeons armed with knowledge about multifocality and/or multicentricity would benefit through more rational pre-surgical planning. Existing methods of detecting multifocality and multicentricity have limited positive predictive value, or have difficulty in guiding biopsy to confirm suspected regions outside the index lesion. Phase I will lay the foundation for Phase II, by demonstrating that biopsy guidance with the device would have a sufficiently high positive predictive value in detecting cancer for an index cancer lesion to warrant proceeding to a definitive Phase II study of the device. Phase II is a prospectively-planned clinical trial testing the ability of the dedicated breast PET device to detect areas of multifocality and/or multicentricity, The gold-standard proof in this trial will be the histopathology of core biopsies of suspicious lesions (other than the index cancer) targeted using the device. The Phase II study is designed to establish that the positive predictive value for the presence of multifocality is greater than a predetermined lower-bound value (selected on the basis of prior relevant public-health determinations). Matching private funds are already committed for all phases of this SBIR project.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Small Business Innovation Research Grants (SBIR) - Phase II (R44)
Project #
4R44CA103102-02
Application #
6941824
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-SRB (52))
Program Officer
Torres-Anjel, Manuel J
Project Start
2003-09-30
Project End
2007-08-31
Budget Start
2004-09-13
Budget End
2005-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2004
Total Cost
$640,250
Indirect Cost
Name
Naviscan Pet Systems, Inc.
Department
Type
DUNS #
160017950
City
San Diego
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
92121
Kalinyak, Judith E; Berg, Wendie A; Schilling, Kathy et al. (2014) Breast cancer detection using high-resolution breast PET compared to whole-body PET or PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:260-75
Berg, Wendie A; Madsen, Kathleen S; Schilling, Kathy et al. (2012) Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:219-32
Berg, Wendie A; Madsen, Kathleen S; Schilling, Kathy et al. (2011) Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology 258:59-72
Narayanan, Deepa; Madsen, Kathleen S; Kalinyak, Judith E et al. (2011) Interpretation of positron emission mammography: feature analysis and rates of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:956-70
Narayanan, Deepa; Madsen, Kathleen S; Kalinyak, Judith E et al. (2011) Interpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:971-81
Berg, Wendie A; Weinberg, Irving N; Narayanan, Deepa et al. (2006) High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (""positron emission mammography"") is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J 12:309-23
Weinberg, Irving N; Beylin, David; Zavarzin, Valera et al. (2005) Positron emission mammography: high-resolution biochemical breast imaging. Technol Cancer Res Treat 4:55-60