Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among women in the US. New discoveries have resulted in the widely accepted view that breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with molecularly distinguishable morphological subtypes. This awareness is driving the development of new paradigms for the prevention, early detection and clinical management of breast cancer. However, there are very limited data on the population effects of these novel cancer control approaches. Population modeling is a unique comparative effectiveness paradigm to fill this gap by translating advances from the laboratory and clinical trials to understanding their net effects on US breast cancer mortality. The CISNET Breast Working Group has collaborated over the past nine years to apply independent population models to evaluate cancer control practices and use results to inform clinical and public health guidelines. This proposal leverages the investment in these models and provides the continuity and cohesion of this highly productive group. The modeling groups include Dana Farber (D). Erasmus MC (E), Georgetown-Einstein (G), MD Anderson (M), Stanford (S) and Wisconsin-Harvard (W). For this application, we will extend our work by modeling populations of women with varying risk factors (e.g., breast density, HRT) for the development of specific molecular subtypes of breast cancer (based on ER and HER2).
Our specific aims are to use these adapted models to: 1) compare the impact of observed practice patterns to the benefits and harms of targeting new screening and adjuvant therapy modalities based on risk factors and molecular subtypes;2) explore the impact of improving access to new services;3) conduct value-of information-like analyses to evaluate the relationship between performance characteristics of a new screening test (e.g. blood based biomarker) and its impact on breast cancer mortality, utilization of treatments and over-diagnosis;and 4) communicate results to end-users using a web-based platform. This work will advance the field of modeling by explicitly capturing molecular attributes of breast cancer, and in so doing, build a robust capacity to inform debates about """"""""best practices"""""""" for cancer control interventions.

Public Health Relevance

Breast cancer is the 2 leading cause of cancer death in US women. New discoveries are re-defining best practices to reduce mortality. However, few of these novel strategies have been fully tested for effectiveness in reducing overall breast cancer deaths in the general population. Moreover, many women remain without access to even current standard cancer-related services. We will use population modeling to fill gaps in knowledge by translating research results from trials to their net effects on US breast cancer mortality rates.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Research Project--Cooperative Agreements (U01)
Project #
5U01CA152958-05
Application #
8739610
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZCA1-SRLB-4 (M1))
Program Officer
Stedman, Margaret R
Project Start
2010-09-01
Project End
2015-08-31
Budget Start
2014-09-01
Budget End
2015-08-31
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2014
Total Cost
$1,314,797
Indirect Cost
$125,834
Name
Georgetown University
Department
Internal Medicine/Medicine
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
049515844
City
Washington
State
DC
Country
United States
Zip Code
20057
Lee, Sandra J; Li, Xiaoxue; Huang, Hui et al. (2018) The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update. Med Decis Making 38:44S-53S
van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T; van den Broek, Jeroen J; Li, Xiaoxue et al. (2018) Modeling Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): An Overview of CISNET Model Approaches. Med Decis Making 38:126S-139S
Panattoni, Laura; Lieu, Tracy A; Jayasekera, Jinani et al. (2018) The impact of gene expression profile testing on confidence in chemotherapy decisions and prognostic expectations. Breast Cancer Res Treat :
Munoz, Diego F; Plevritis, Sylvia K (2018) Estimating Breast Cancer Survival by Molecular Subtype in the Absence of Screening and Adjuvant Treatment. Med Decis Making 38:32S-43S
van den Broek, Jeroen J; van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S et al. (2018) Comparing CISNET Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Predictions to Observed Clinical Trial Results of Mammography Screening from Ages 40 to 49. Med Decis Making 38:140S-150S
Plevritis, Sylvia K; Munoz, Diego; Kurian, Allison W et al. (2018) Association of Screening and Treatment With Breast Cancer Mortality by Molecular Subtype in US Women, 2000-2012. JAMA 319:154-164
Xia, Fang; Ning, Jing; Huang, Xuelin (2018) Empirical Comparison of the Breslow Estimator and the Kalbfleisch Prentice Estimator for Survival Functions. J Biom Biostat 9:
Huang, Xuelin; Li, Yisheng; Song, Juhee et al. (2018) A Bayesian Simulation Model for Breast Cancer Screening, Incidence, Treatment, and Mortality. Med Decis Making 38:78S-88S
Yan, Fangrong; Zhu, Huihong; Liu, Junlin et al. (2018) Design and inference for 3-stage bioequivalence testing with serial sampling data. Pharm Stat 17:458-476
van den Broek, Jeroen J; van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T; Mandelblatt, Jeanne S et al. (2018) Comparing CISNET Breast Cancer Models Using the Maximum Clinical Incidence Reduction Methodology. Med Decis Making 38:112S-125S

Showing the most recent 10 out of 80 publications