Although the prevalence of """"""""family-friendly"""""""" policies in US workplaces has increased dramatically in recent years, few have been studied using scientifically sound designs. To address this critical gap, NIH and CDC formed the Work, Family, and Health Network (WFHN). During Phase 1, WFHN designed and conducted multiple pilot and feasibility studies. For Phase 2, the WFHN has been called upon to implement an innovative intervention and to evaluate the intervention using a group randomized experimental design. This application constitutes the University of Minnesota's proposal to serve as a Research Unit in Phase 2 of the WFHN. The goal of the proposed study is to assess the effects of a workplace intervention designed to reduce work-family conflict, and thereby improve the health and well being of employees, their families, and their workplaces. The study intervention is grounded in theory from multiple disciplines and supported by findings from our pilot/feasibility studies on the importance of increasing family-supportive supervisor behaviors and employees'control over work. We will assess the efficacy of the intervention via group randomized field experiments, one at each of two employers representing different industries. Within each industry partner, 30 worksites of 50-120 employees each will be randomly assigned to intervention or usual practice conditions. All employee and supervisor participants will be assessed at baseline and at 6-, 12-, and 18-months post baseline, including survey interviews and health assessments of cardiovascular risk and sleep dysregulation based on selected biomarkers and actigraphy. Employees'spouse/partners and/or child aged 10-17 years will be assessed to document the impact of the intervention on family functioning. In addition, to provide a more detailed perspective on the temporal relationship of work-family conflict and health, a subsample of 500 employee participants and their child will participate in a daily diary assessment including telephone interviews and saliva sampling. Our process evaluation documents details of intervention fidelity, implementation, and dose received by participants. The WFHN will also translate findings to business environments and other public media channels. The study holds great promise for informing the implementation of evidence-based family-friendly policies, and therefore improving the health and well-being of employees and their families nationwide. The Minnesota investigators are uniquely qualified to contribute to the Phase 2 study, bringing sociological expertise in organizational change and in the varying effects of the work environment by employees'gender, age, life stage, race/ethnicity, and health status to the Network. The Minnesota Phase 1 pilot study contributed directly and significantly to the Phase 2 protocol. This team will serve as a critical node in the Network's refinement, implementation, and evaluation of the innovative workplace intervention to be tested.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Research Project--Cooperative Agreements (U01)
Project #
5U01HD051256-06
Application #
8009524
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-HOP-B (50))
Program Officer
Bures, Regina M
Project Start
2005-07-18
Project End
2013-11-30
Budget Start
2010-12-01
Budget End
2011-11-30
Support Year
6
Fiscal Year
2011
Total Cost
$1,152,989
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
Department
Type
Organized Research Units
DUNS #
555917996
City
Minneapolis
State
MN
Country
United States
Zip Code
55455
Scott, Stacey B; Sliwinski, Martin J; Zawadzki, Matthew et al. (2018) A Coordinated Analysis of Variance in Affect in Daily Life. Assessment :1073191118799460
DePasquale, Nicole; Zarit, Steven H; Mogle, Jacqueline et al. (2018) Double- and Triple-Duty Caregiving Men: An Examination of Subjective Stress and Perceived Schedule Control. J Appl Gerontol 37:464-492
Crain, Tori L; Hammer, Leslie B; Bodner, Todd et al. (2018) Sustaining sleep: Results from the randomized controlled work, family, and health study. J Occup Health Psychol :
Berkman, Lisa F (2018) The trials of trials: RCTs to assess causal questions about social interventions. Eur J Public Health 28:207-208
DePasquale, Nicole; Polenick, Courtney A; Davis, Kelly D et al. (2018) A Bright Side to the Work-Family Interface: Husbands' Support as a Resource in Double-and-Triple-Duty Caregiving Wives' Work Lives. Gerontologist 58:674-685
Almeida, David M; Lee, Soomi; Walter, Kimberly N et al. (2018) The effects of a workplace intervention on employees' cortisol awakening response. Community Work Fam 21:151-167
DePasquale, Nicole; Mogle, Jacqueline; Zarit, Steven H et al. (2018) The Family Time Squeeze: Perceived Family Time Adequacy Buffers Work Strain in Certified Nursing Assistants With Multiple Caregiving Roles. Gerontologist 58:546-555
DePasquale, Nicole; Polenick, Courtney A; Hinde, Jesse et al. (2018) Health Behavior Among Men With Multiple Family Roles: The Moderating Effects of Perceived Partner Relationship Quality. Am J Mens Health 12:2006-2017
Dowd, William N; Bray, Jeremy W; Barbosa, Carolina et al. (2017) Cost and Return on Investment of a Work-Family Intervention in the Extended Care Industry: Evidence From the Work, Family, and Health Network. J Occup Environ Med 59:956-965
Lee, Soomi; Davis, Kelly D; McHale, Susan M et al. (2017) When Mothers' Work Matters for Youths' Daily Time Use: Implications of Evening and Weekend Shifts. J Child Fam Stud 26:2077-2089

Showing the most recent 10 out of 69 publications