In this highly collaborative multi-disciplinary initiative, we propose to explore and compare the impact of using WGS in clinical conditions that model pure forms of each of these approaches. To model General Genomic Medicine, 10 primary care physicians and 100 of their healthy middle-aged patients will be enrolled. To model Disease-Specific Genomic Medicine, 10 cardiologists and 100 of their patients presenting with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) will be enrolled. We will conduct an exploratory clinical trial randomizing physicians and their patients within each of these models to receive clinically meaningful information derived from WGS versus current standard of care. Project 1 will create standards for variant disclosure, enroll physicians and patients into the protocol and safely monitor the use of genomic information in clinical practice. Project 2 will sequence, analyze and interpret WGS for the physicians to use. And Project 3 will examine preferences and motivations of physicians and patients enrolled, evaluate the flow and utilization of genomic information within the clinical interactions, and assess understanding, behavior, medical consequences and healthcare costs associated with the use of WGS in these models of medical practice. This initiative will significantly accelerate the use of genomics into clinical medicine by creating and safely testing novel ways of integrating information from WGS into physician care of patients.
Physicians will soon use WGS to derive insight into future health risks and inform prevention efforts in healthy patients and to interrogate particular sets o genes known to be associated with disease in patients presenting with a family history and symptoms. The results of this study will accelerate the use of genomics in clinical medicine by creating and testing ways to integrate WGS into physician care of patients.
|Wolf, Susan M; Scholtes, Emily; Koenig, Barbara A et al. (2018) Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants. J Law Med Ethics 46:87-109|
|Christensen, Kurt D; Uhlmann, Wendy R; Roberts, J Scott et al. (2018) A randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk information for Alzheimer disease via telephone. Genet Med 20:132-141|
|Wolf, Susan M; Amendola, Laura M; Berg, Jonathan S et al. (2018) Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med 20:545-553|
|Christensen, Kurt D; Vassy, Jason L; Phillips, Kathryn A et al. (2018) Short-term costs of integrating whole-genome sequencing into primary care and cardiology settings: a pilot randomized trial. Genet Med :|
|Vassy, Jason L; Davis, J Kelly; Kirby, Christine et al. (2018) How Primary Care Providers Talk to Patients about Genome Sequencing Results: Risk, Rationale, and Recommendation. J Gen Intern Med 33:877-885|
|Lane, William J; Aguad, Maria; Smeland-Wagman, Robin et al. (2018) A whole genome approach for discovering the genetic basis of blood group antigens: independent confirmation for P1 and Xga. Transfusion :|
|Ridge, Perry G; Wadsworth, Mark E; Miller, Justin B et al. (2018) Assembly of 809 whole mitochondrial genomes with clinical, imaging, and fluid biomarker phenotyping. Alzheimers Dement 14:514-519|
|Prado, Maria G; Iversen, Maura D; Yu, Zhi et al. (2018) Effectiveness of a Web-Based Personalized Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Tool With or Without a Health Educator for Knowledge of Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk Factors. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 70:1421-1430|
|Roberts, J Scott; Robinson, Jill O; Diamond, Pamela M et al. (2018) Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project. Genet Med 20:1069-1076|
|Guan, Yue; Roter, Debra L; Wolff, Jennifer L et al. (2018) The impact of genetic counselors' use of facilitative strategies on cognitive and emotional processing of genetic risk disclosure for Alzheimer's disease. Patient Educ Couns 101:817-823|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 129 publications