The objective of the proposed trial, International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease (ISCHEMIA-CKD) Ancillary Study, is to determine the best management strategy for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) [defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m2) or on dialysis] and moderate-severe ischemia. ISCHEMIA-CKD will be a prospective, multicenter, international, randomized, controlled trial, conducted as a trial within the main ISCHEMIA trial that will enroll 1,000 SIHD patients with advanced CKD with moderate-severe ischemia by stress imaging and ejection fraction e35%. The trial hypothesis is that for patients with moderate-severe ischemia on stress imaging, a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization (cath) followed by revascularization plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) is superior to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cath and revascularization reserved for patients who fail OMT. The primary endpoint will be time to death from any cause or myocardial infarction (MI). Quality of life and cost-effectiveness will also be compared between the two strategies. Patients with CKD are more likely to die than reach end stage renal disease (ESRD) and are therefore considered coronary artery disease (CAD) risk equivalents. The prognosis of patients with advanced CKD is poor with a mortality rate as high as 50-70% at 4-years and is worse than that for patients who have cancers, heart failure, stroke or acute MI. Despite this high risk of death, ~80% of recent CAD trials exclude CKD subjects and most of the treatments aimed at reducing their events are therefore extrapolated from cohorts without CKD. Advanced CKD subjects are underrepresented in contemporary trials comparing revascularization with medical therapy in SIHD patients such as the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial, or the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial, making any assessment about the utility of revascularization plus medical therapy vs. initial medical therapy alone in ths cohort problematic. Limited observational studies have suggested a possible survival benefit of revascularization but yet it is rarely (10-45%) performed for fear of acute complications including contrast induced acute kidney injury, indicating substantial equipoise in current clinical practice As we prepare for the CKD boom with an aging population and increasing prevalence of diabetes and obesity, and if one of the major goals as set by Healthy People 2020 (improving survival and quality of life for people with CKD) is to be accomplished, a treatment strategy trial such as the ISCHEMIA- CKD trial is urgently needed to target a reduction in death and cardiovascular events in this high-risk population. The importance of this question to be addressed by ISCHEMIA-CKD is the reason it was ranked by the Institute of Medicine among the top 100 US priorities for comparative effectiveness research.
This trial will inform clinicians and patients about a common question they encounter: when a patient with advanced chronic kidney disease has a markedly abnormal cardiac stress test: is it better to do an invasive angiogram (take a picture of the heart arteries) with the intention of opening or bypassing any blockages with stents or surgery plus optimal medical therapy, or is it better to optimize medical therapy and only consider the angiogram with stents or surgery if symptoms cannot be controlled? If there is a benefit to doing an angiogram and treating with stents or surgery, then clinicians and patients must be made aware of these benefits and put them into practice to prevent bad outcomes like heart attacks and death;if the results show there is no benefit or there is harm from that routine invasive testing, then treatment would begin with only intensive lifestyle change and medication to control symptoms and reduce risk. Either finding could provide much-needed information to guide practice and improve quality of medical care.
|Bangalore, Sripal; Maron, David J; Fleg, Jerome L et al. (2018) International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease (ISCHEMIA-CKD): Rationale and design. Am Heart J 205:42-52|
|Bangalore, Sripal; Maron, David J; Reynolds, Harmony R et al. (2018) ISCHEMIA: Establishing the Primary End Point. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 11:e004791|
|Bangalore, Sripal; Briguori, Carlo (2017) Preventive Strategies for Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: And the Winner Is…. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 10:|
|Bagai, Akshay; Alexander, Karen P; Berger, Jeffrey S et al. (2017) Use of troponin assay 99th percentile as the decision level for myocardial infarction diagnosis. Am Heart J 190:135-139|
|Bangalore, Sripal (2016) Stress testing in patients with chronic kidney disease: The need for ancillary markers for effective risk stratification and prognosis. J Nucl Cardiol 23:570-4|
|Bangalore, Sripal (2016) Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Clinical Trial Conundrum of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9:2110-2112|
|Bangalore, Sripal; Guo, Yu; Samadashvili, Zaza et al. (2015) Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease: Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:1209-1220|
|Bangalore, Sripal; Maron, David J; Hochman, Judith S (2015) Evidence-Based Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: Challenges and Confusion. JAMA 314:1917-8|