The main objective of the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) is to assure the NCI that the radiation dose delivered to patients entered onto interinstitutional clinical trials is clinically comparable. This is accomplished ultimately by a review of the radiation treatment records of individual patients entered onto these clinical trials. The RPC verifies that the treatment reported was in fact delivered and, in conjunction with cooperative group clinicians, verifies that the treatment was within the protocol specifications. The dosimetry data used for these reviews is obtained by an on-site dosimetry review of the participating institutions by one of the RPC physicists. Key radiation therapy staff are interviewed, typical treatment cases are assigned and evaluated, and dosimetry measurements are made on the therapy units. Mailed thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) are evaluated on a periodic basis to identify potential calibration discrepancies and to assure the RPC that the institution has not modified its dosimetry practices since the RPC on-site visit or the last TLD evaluation. The RPC continuously modifies its techniques to reflect common practice at participating institutions. Conventional megavoltage x-ray, megavoltage electron and low dose rate brachytherapy dosimetry are routinely monitored. Special procedures monitored include high dose rate brachytherapy, total body photon therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and conformal therapy. Whenever discrepancies are discovered, the RPC works with the institution's staff to bind an acceptable solution to resolve the discrepancy. The RPC provides these services for all 9 cooperative groups, and collaborates with 4 conventional radiotherapy quality assurance offices and 2 specialized quality assurance offices (3-D and protons) that serve these cooperative groups. The RPC also provides advice to the cooperative groups on quality assurance questions, including assistance in drafting the radiotherapy portion of treatment protocols. Research is performed on problems associated with multiple institutions using multiple energies and modalities to deliver clinically comparable doses. There are currently 1063 megavoltage therapy facilities monitored by the RPC. The staff of the RPC includes 8.1 FTE professional staff and 15.0 other staff. Approximately 27 percent of the personnel budget relates to on-site dosimetry review, 21 percent to the TLD service, and 21 percent for chart review. The remainder of the personnel budget relates to formal interactions with the cooperative groups and other activities such as computer programming and statistical support.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Cooperative Clinical Research--Cooperative Agreements (U10)
Project #
5U10CA010953-31
Application #
2748684
Study Section
Cancer Clinical Investigation Review Committee (CCI)
Program Officer
Stone, Helen B
Project Start
1978-09-01
Project End
1999-12-31
Budget Start
1998-08-01
Budget End
1999-12-31
Support Year
31
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Department
Radiation-Diagnostic/Oncology
Type
Other Domestic Higher Education
DUNS #
001910777
City
Houston
State
TX
Country
United States
Zip Code
77030
Kerns, James R; Stingo, Francesco; Followill, David S et al. (2017) Treatment Planning System Calculation Errors Are Present in Most Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Houston Phantom Failures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 98:1197-1203
Kry, Stephen F; Dromgoole, Lainy; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2017) Radiation Therapy Deficiencies Identified During On-Site Dosimetry Visits by the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston Quality Assurance Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:1094-1100
Faught, Austin M; Davidson, Scott E; Fontenot, Jonas et al. (2017) Development of a Monte Carlo multiple source model for inclusion in a dose calculation auditing tool. Med Phys 44:4943-4951
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Followill, David S (2017) Pencil Beam Algorithms Are Unsuitable for Proton Dose Calculations in Lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:750-756
Huang, Jessie Y; Followill, David S; Howell, Rebecca M et al. (2016) Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants. Med Phys 43:5117
Taylor, Paige A; Kry, Stephen F; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2016) Results From the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston's Anthropomorphic Phantoms Used for Proton Therapy Clinical Trial Credentialing. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:242-8
Davidson, Scott E; Cui, Jing; Kry, Stephen et al. (2016) Modification and validation of an analytical source model for external beam radiotherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations. Med Phys 43:4842
Scarboro, Sarah B; Cody, Dianna; Alvarez, Paola et al. (2015) Characterization of the nanoDot OSLD dosimeter in CT. Med Phys 42:1797-807
Huang, Jessie Y; Kerns, James R; Nute, Jessica L et al. (2015) An evaluation of three commercially available metal artifact reduction methods for CT imaging. Phys Med Biol 60:1047-67
McKenzie, Elizabeth M; Balter, Peter A; Stingo, Francesco C et al. (2014) Reproducibility in patient-specific IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15:4741

Showing the most recent 10 out of 78 publications