The primary requisite of programs designed to improve treatment modalities in malignant brain tumor is that an adequate number of patients be available to performs prospective randomly organized trials. Only by such trials can effective improvements in therapy be substantiated. The history of the treatment of this disease includes a number of instances in which the promise of an effective advance in treatment held out in a Phase II trial has failed to materialize in a Phase III trial. It is likely that the major reason for this failure is that an inadequate number of patients was entered. Brain Tumor Study Group data indicate that there are multiple disease characteristics which influence survival and that these prognostic variables differ from one patient to another. Thus, enough patients must be entered into a trial to distinguish between the effects of therapy and those produced by prognostic variables. Furthermore we believe that randomized prospective trials that include a control group are better than those using historical controls. The major reason for this is the occurrence during the course of trials of a change in the ability to diagnose the disease. For example, the computerized tomographic scanner (CT) produced a quantum change in the ability to diagnose brain tumor in some patients. How could it be shown that the improvement in survival that occurred over the years that the CT scan came into use was not merely a function of earlier diagnosis. Because the BTSG has always included a """"""""control"""""""" arm consisting of surgery, radiation therapy and BCNU, we could show that despite the introduction of the CT scan the combination of surgery, radiation therapy and BCNU produced essentially the same overall effect.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Type
Cooperative Clinical Research--Cooperative Agreements (U10)
Project #
3U10CA036014-03S2
Application #
3557872
Study Section
Cancer Regional Studies Review Committee (CRS)
Project Start
1983-12-01
Project End
1988-11-30
Budget Start
1985-12-01
Budget End
1988-11-30
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
1988
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
New York University
Department
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
004514360
City
New York
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10012
Hiesiger, E M; Green, S B; Shapiro, W R et al. (1995) Results of a randomized trial comparing intra-arterial cisplatin and intravenous PCNU for the treatment of primary brain tumors in adults: Brain Tumor Cooperative Group trial 8420A. J Neurooncol 25:143-54
Kupersmith, M J; Frohman, L P; Choi, I S et al. (1988) Visual system toxicity following intra-arterial chemotherapy. Neurology 38:284-9
Stylopoulos, L A; George, A E; de Leon, M J et al. (1988) Longitudinal CT study of parenchymal brain changes in glioma survivors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 9:517-22
Foo, S H; Choi, I S; Berenstein, A et al. (1986) Supraophthalmic intracarotid infusion of BCNU for malignant glioma. Neurology 36:1437-44