Urge and mixed urinary incontinence are common conditions, affecting 10-20% of American women. While several treatment modalities exist, pharmacotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment. Much of the research pertaining to treatment for urge and mixed incontinence is limited by short duration of follow-up, homogeneous patient populations, stringent exclusion criteria, poorly defined outcome measures, and lack of placebo control. Factors that predict success or failure of specific treatments are poorly understood. The broad objectives of this prospective randomized clinical trial are to describe and compare the efficacy (Phase 1) and the longer term effectiveness (Phase 2) of several treatments for urge and mixed incontinence, to determine the predictive value of pre-treatment urodynamics, and to understand factors associated with treatment efficacy and effectiveness. 400 women with urge incontinence or mixed incontinence with urge as the predominant symptom will be randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: (1) tolterodine, (2) physiotherapy plus placebo, (3) physiotherapy plus tolterodine, and (4) placebo alone. The primary outcome measure used to define treatment efficacy at three months (Phase 1) is at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of incontinent episodes per week (of at least 60. Secondary outcomes measures include (1) voiding frequency, (2) patient satisfaction as recorded on a visual analogue scale, (3) adverse events, (4) urge incontinence specific quality of life measure, (5) pelvic floor distress inventory, (6) sexual function assessment tool, and (7) generic quality of life measure. Following evaluation of Phase 1 outcomes, women will continue to be followed every 3 months for 1 year. Women unsuccessfully treated will be offered alternative therapy. Medium term (one year) effectiveness of treatments for urge and mixed incontinence will be described by comparing baseline and one-year outcome measures. All data will be analyzed in an intent-to-treat fashion.
The specific aims of this study are 1) to describe and compare the 3- month and 1-year efficacy of urge incontinence treatment among the 4 groups stated above, 2) to determine whether specific pre-treatment urodynamic variables are predictive of treatment efficacy, 3) to identify factors associated with treatment efficacy, and 4) to describe the difference in clinical course and quality of life among treatment groups and as compared to baseline after 3 months and 1 year of intervention.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD)
Type
Cooperative Clinical Research--Cooperative Agreements (U10)
Project #
5U10HD041248-05
Application #
6943071
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZHD1-DRG-D (13))
Program Officer
Weber, Anne M
Project Start
2001-09-01
Project End
2008-06-30
Budget Start
2005-07-01
Budget End
2008-06-30
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
$434,905
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Iowa
Department
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
062761671
City
Iowa City
State
IA
Country
United States
Zip Code
52242
Gutman, Robert E; Nygaard, Ingrid E; Ye, Wen et al. (2013) The pelvic floor complication scale: a new instrument for reconstructive pelvic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208:81.e1-9
Schaffer, Joseph; Nager, Charles W; Xiang, Fang et al. (2012) Predictors of success and satisfaction of nonsurgical therapy for stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 120:91-7
Visco, Anthony G; Brubaker, Linda; Richter, Holly E et al. (2012) Anticholinergic versus botulinum toxin A comparison trial for the treatment of bothersome urge urinary incontinence: ABC trial. Contemp Clin Trials 33:184-96
Hoyte, Lennox; Ye, Wen; Brubaker, Linda et al. (2011) Segmentations of MRI images of the female pelvic floor: a study of inter- and intra-reader reliability. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:684-91
Handa, Victoria L; Whitcomb, Emily; Weidner, Alison C et al. (2011) Sexual function before and after non-surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 17:30-35
Gutman, Robert E; Bradley, Catherine S; Ye, Wen et al. (2010) Effects of colpocleisis on bowel symptoms among women with severe pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 21:461-6
Heilbrun, Marta E; Nygaard, Ingrid E; Lockhart, Mark E et al. (2010) Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:488.e1-6
Bradley, Catherine S; Rahn, David D; Nygaard, Ingrid E et al. (2010) The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 29:727-34
Richter, Holly E; Burgio, Kathryn L; Brubaker, Linda et al. (2010) Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 115:609-17
Handa, Victoria L; Lockhart, Mark E; Kenton, Kimberly S et al. (2009) Magnetic resonance assessment of pelvic anatomy and pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20:133-9

Showing the most recent 10 out of 54 publications