Newborn screening (NBS) is an essential public health program in all 50 states. The falling cost of whole genome/ exome sequencing provides an opportunity to ask whether whole genome analysis (WGA) might serve as a method of cost-effective newborn screening for any and every condition. We will address certain critical questions raised by the application of this technology to NBS. We will use Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) as a cost-effective method of WGA in 1620 newborn blood spots that are linked to the clinical data of the newborns. We will then test WES as a NBS Tool for metabolic and immunological disorders. These data will be used to 1) compare the sensitivity and specificity of mutation data with biochemical testing, 2) identify gene variants that predict which children with certain metabolic disorders are at greater risk for metabolic decompensation, 3) identify mutations in genes responsible for those primary immunodeficiencies that are not detected by the current T-Cell receptor excision circle assay used for severe combined immunodeficiency screening, and 4) scan 9 genes for variants that are clinically important for drug metabolism and would be typical secondary findings if WES were to be used as a NBS method. We will also develop a participant protection framework for conducting WGA during the neonatal period, determine the views, perspectives, and value preferences of key stakeholders about using WGA for NBS, collaborate with the UC Hastings Consortium on Law, Science and Health Policy, to identify the legal and constitutional issues for using WGA, and for incorporating PGx into NBS programs, and develop and disseminate policy recommendations for expanded NBS programs based on WGA.
We plan to test the use of one method of whole genome analysis, whole exome sequencing, as the sole method of newborn screening for disorders currently being screened for and others that are missed by current newborn screening but for which newborn screening might be appropriate. This would provide substantial public health benefit for newborns who might otherwise go undiagnosed and untreated while serious, even irreversible, damage occurs. Equally important, we will explore parents' interest in incidental findings and develop appropriate legal frameworks to make sure NBS by WGA can be done ethically.
|Bassaganyas, Laia; Freedman, George; Vaka, Dedeepya et al. (2018) Whole exome and whole genome sequencing with dried blood spot DNA without whole genome amplification. Hum Mutat 39:167-171|
|Morgan, Alexander A; Crawford, Dana C; Denny, Josh C et al. (2017) PRECISION MEDICINE: DATA AND DISCOVERY FOR IMPROVED HEALTH AND THERAPY. Pac Symp Biocomput 22:348-355|
|Berg, Jonathan S; Agrawal, Pankaj B; Bailey Jr, Donald B et al. (2017) Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health. Pediatrics 139:|
|King, Jaime S; Smith, Monica E (2016) Whole-Genome Screening of Newborns? The Constitutional Boundaries of State Newborn Screening Programs. Pediatrics 137 Suppl 1:S8-15|
|Joseph, Galen; Chen, Flavia; Harris-Wai, Julie et al. (2016) Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. Pediatrics 137 Suppl 1:S36-46|
|Brenner, Steven E; Kingsmore, Stephen; Mooney, Sean D et al. (2016) USE OF GENOME DATA IN NEWBORNS AS A STARTING POINT FOR LIFE-LONG PRECISION MEDICINE. Pac Symp Biocomput 21:568-75|
|Parens, Erik (2015) Drifting Away from Informed Consent in the Era of Personalized Medicine. Hastings Cent Rep 45:16-20|
|Shah, Arti D; Hsiao, Edward C; O'Donnell, Betsy et al. (2015) Maternal Hypercalcemia Due to Failure of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin-D3 Catabolism in a Patient With CYP24A1 Mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:2832-6|
|McCullough, Laurence B; Brothers, Kyle B; Chung, Wendy K et al. (2015) Professionally Responsible Disclosure of Genomic Sequencing Results in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics 136:e974-82|
|Koenig, Barbara A (2014) Have we asked too much of consent? Hastings Cent Rep 44:33-4|