The plasmid prophage of bacteriophage P1 can have as few as two copies per dividing cell. These are distributed to daughter cells by a precise mechanism, analogous to mitosis. We have been studying this system as a model for chromosome replication and segregation for the past twenty years. The P1 partition mechanism consists of a 2.1-kb region with and operon encoding parA and parB genes and a down-stream cis-acting site, parS. P1 ParA and ParB are the most studied members of a family of protein pairs encoded by a diverse group of plasmids and host chromosomes. They are responsible for chromosome segregation in several bacterial species. ParB binds specifically to parS, forming a protein-DNA complex. ParA is an ATPase that interacts with the core complex during partition. This year, we have made considerable progress in understanding the process by following the position and movement of the plasmid DNA during the cell cycle by microscopy in living cells. This is made possible by the properties of a GFP-ParB hybrid protein which loads onto the DNA as mutiple copies at the parS site, and produces a bright fluorescent focus within the cell. The results obtained are surprising. Two or more copies of the plasmid gather as a single focus at the cell center where they attached to some structure: probably the cell division apparatus. Partition consists of an explosive dispersal of these copies outward toward the cell poles that occurs just as the cell is dividing. As copies are always ejected in both directions, cell division always results in two daughter cells, both of which contain at least one plasmid copy. Preliminary studies on mutant plasmids that are defective for partition suggest that they are unable to attach to the central structure, or in one example, that attachment occurs, but there is no explosive dispersal. Plasmid partition is an analogous process to chromosome segregation, and the existence of bacterial analogs of the ParA and ParB proteins suggests that there are mechanistic parallels between the two processes. Our continuing efforts to illuminate the process of chromosome segregation should therefore benefit greatly from our new findings concerning P1 plasmid partition. In addition, we have shown that the same fuorescence labeling of DNA sites described above can be adapted to following the dynamics of chromosome replication and segregation, and we plan to exploit this technique heavily during the coming year.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Division of Basic Sciences - NCI (NCI)
Type
Intramural Research (Z01)
Project #
1Z01BC010333-02
Application #
6559216
Study Section
(GRCB)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Basic Sciences
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
United States
Zip Code
Nielsen, Henrik J; Li, Yongfang; Youngren, Brenda et al. (2006) Progressive segregation of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Mol Microbiol 61:383-93
Camara, Johanna E; Breier, Adam M; Brendler, Therese et al. (2005) Hda inactivation of DnaA is the predominant mechanism preventing hyperinitiation of Escherichia coli DNA replication. EMBO Rep 6:736-41
Brendler, T; Sawitzke, J; Sergueev, K et al. (2000) A case for sliding SeqA tracts at anchored replication forks during Escherichia coli chromosome replication and segregation. EMBO J 19:6249-58
Sawitzke, J A; Austin, S (2000) Suppression of chromosome segregation defects of Escherichia coli muk mutants by mutations in topoisomerase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:1671-6
Youngren, B; Radnedge, L; Hu, P et al. (2000) A plasmid partition system of the P1-P7par family from the pMT1 virulence plasmid of Yersinia pestis. J Bacteriol 182:3924-8
Sayeed, S; Reaves, L; Radnedge, L et al. (2000) The stability region of the large virulence plasmid of Shigella flexneri encodes an efficient postsegregational killing system. J Bacteriol 182:2416-21