The bacterial virus lambda is widely used as a paradigm for gene regulation and is a premier system for developing theoretical modeling methodologies, which are becoming increasingly important for addressing complex genetic networks involved in signal transduction, apoptosis, cancer development, and other systems. Our laboratory uses E. coli and lambda as a model system for studying developmental circuits, the genes that regulate lambda circuitry, and host/phage interactions. Viruses of prokaryotes as well as eukaryotes use host functions to fulfill their developmental lifecycle and respond to the environmental conditions of the infected cell. We believe that the virus targets critical functions of the host for viral development and those functions are part of the basic sensory system of the host for reacting to the environment. The things we learn about host interactions with lambda is relevant for studies of eukaryotic viruses. Essentially, the viruses tell us what is most important in the host and how to study it. The temperate bacteriophage lambda is a great tool for such studies; it can develop as a lytic virus able to rapidly reproduce while destroying its host, or it can develop as a lysogen existing as a dormant provirus within the host genome. How it decides these fates has been an object of study for years, and these studies continue to reveal fascinating new discoveries about this simple system, a system that is widely used as a model for understanding and describing genetic circuitry networks for all organisms. Such model studies depend upon accurate and detailed information about its components, and lambda is a great system to build on because of its rich scientific history. Our lambda studies are multifaceted. We are attempting to describe the lysis/lysogeny decision following lambda infection by using direct readouts for the lytic and the lysogenic pathways. This readout takes the form of continuous intracellular GFP measurements following infection, which measure Q function for lytic output and CII function for lysogenic development. The number of phage infecting a cell affects the decision, as do the growth conditions. Other gene functions like CIII, CI, and Cro have effects on the activities of the Q and CII functions. We have designed a reporter system for the lambda pL and pR early promoters within the bacterial chromosome. This reporter allows us to examine the effects CI repressor and the left oL and right oR operators on repression and induction in the prophage state. Our studies have verified genetically an interaction of the two operator regions, which occurs by a cooperative binding of the repressor tetramers at each operator to form an octamer. This repressor octamerization and joining of oL with oR increases repression in the prophage state and prevents Cro action at the operators until repressor activity is eliminated by induction. This is a result that contradicts the Genetic Switch of Ptashne.N is a critical regulatory protein for the lytic pathway. The lambda N antiterminator is the paradigm used to understand the Tat transcription antiterminator protein of HIV. Classically, N is known to act as a positive regulator of transcription; we recently found that N is also a negative regulator of its own translation. As a positive regulator, N modifies the transcription elongation complexes that initiate at the pL and pR promoters by converting RNA polymerase (RNAPol) to a form that is resistant to transcription termination. N with several host proteins called Nus bind RNA sites, NUT, using the RNA as a tether to interact with the elongating RNAPol to form the antitermination complex. As a negative regulator, the N antitermination complex represses N translation. The E. coli dsRNA endoribonuclease, RNaseIII, which is the bacterial homolog of the eukaryotic dicer protein involved in RNAi, regulates N's repression of its own translation.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Division of Basic Sciences - NCI (NCI)
Type
Intramural Research (Z01)
Project #
1Z01BC010336-07
Application #
7338470
Study Section
(GRCB)
Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
7
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Basic Sciences
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
United States
Zip Code
Thomason, Lynn C; Oppenheim, Amos B; Court, Donald L (2009) Modifying bacteriophage lambda with recombineering. Methods Mol Biol 501:239-51
Luo, Xiao; Hsiao, He-Hsuan; Bubunenko, Mikhail et al. (2008) Structural and functional analysis of the E. coli NusB-S10 transcription antitermination complex. Mol Cell 32:791-802
Gan, Jianhua; Shaw, Gary; Tropea, Joseph E et al. (2008) A stepwise model for double-stranded RNA processing by ribonuclease III. Mol Microbiol 67:143-54
Korepanov, Alexey P; Gongadze, George M; Garber, Maria B et al. (2007) Importance of the 5 S rRNA-binding ribosomal proteins for cell viability and translation in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 366:1199-208
Court, Donald L; Oppenheim, Amos B; Adhya, Sankar L (2007) A new look at bacteriophage lambda genetic networks. J Bacteriol 189:298-304
Chan, Waiin; Costantino, Nina; Li, Ruixue et al. (2007) A recombineering based approach for high-throughput conditional knockout targeting vector construction. Nucleic Acids Res 35:e64
Sawitzke, James A; Thomason, Lynn C; Costantino, Nina et al. (2007) Recombineering: in vivo genetic engineering in E. coli, S. enterica, and beyond. Methods Enzymol 421:171-99
Thomason, Lynn C; Costantino, Nina; Shaw, Dana V et al. (2007) Multicopy plasmid modification with phage lambda Red recombineering. Plasmid 58:148-58
Bubunenko, Mikhail; Korepanov, Alexey; Court, Donald L et al. (2006) 30S ribosomal subunits can be assembled in vivo without primary binding ribosomal protein S15. RNA 12:1229-39
Datta, Simanti; Costantino, Nina; Court, Donald L (2006) A set of recombineering plasmids for gram-negative bacteria. Gene 379:109-15

Showing the most recent 10 out of 20 publications