Using relatively simple animals, and focusing primarily on olfaction, our unit combines electrophysiological, anatomical, behavioral, and genetic techniques to examine the ways intact neural circuits, driven by sensory stimuli, process information. In the past year, our research program has addressed several questions, among them: What mechanisms underlie information coding and decoding? How are multi-modal stimuli integrated into unified perceptions? And how are innate sensory preferences determined? Our work reveals basic mechanisms by which sensory information is transformed, stabilized, and compared as it makes its way through the nervous system.? ? Recently, we explored the neural coding of natural odor stimuli. Projection neurons (PNs) respond to odor puffs with odor identity- and concentration-specific sequences of spiking, inhibition, and quiescence. How does this spatiotemporal mechanism encode odors in rapid trains of nearly overlapping brief pulses, as could occur in a natural odor plume? Does the temporal structure of the stimulus interfere with the temporal structure of the neural representation? For most PN-odor combinations, numbers of odor pulse elicited spikes changed reliably with pulse position, as responses to one puff interfered with responses to subsequent ones. Despite the interference observed in individual PNs, the across-ensemble response of PNs could excellent classification success for any given 50ms bin, regardless of tested inter-pulse interval. No single PN reliably coded for the pulse timing of all odors. Yet, a template-based classification scheme using the ensemble response could reliably detect peaks in classification performance for each pulse in the train, thus encoding odor pulse arrival time and duration, as well as odor identity and concentration. Additionally, we found that repeated odor presentations caused multiple forms of neural plasticity, acting on different time scales. We are continuing to explore these issues. Additionally, we are investigating mechanisms underlying the innate coding of sensory information and multimodal sensory integration.

Project Start
Project End
Budget Start
Budget End
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
U.S. National Inst/Child Hlth/Human Dev
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
State
Country
United States
Zip Code
Assisi, Collins; Stopfer, Mark; Laurent, Gilles et al. (2007) Adaptive regulation of sparseness by feedforward inhibition. Nat Neurosci 10:1176-84
Vislay-Meltzer, Rebecca L; Stopfer, Mark (2007) Olfactory coding: a plastic approach to timing precision. Curr Biol 17:R797-9
Stopfer, Mark (2007) Olfactory processing: massive convergence onto sparse codes. Curr Biol 17:R363-4
Kay, Leslie M; Stopfer, Mark (2006) Information processing in the olfactory systems of insects and vertebrates. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17:433-42
Bazhenov, Maxim; Stopfer, Mark; Sejnowski, Terrence J et al. (2005) Fast odor learning improves reliability of odor responses in the locust antennal lobe. Neuron 46:483-92
Brown, Stacey L; Joseph, Joby; Stopfer, Mark (2005) Encoding a temporally structured stimulus with a temporally structured neural representation. Nat Neurosci 8:1568-76
Stopfer, Mark; Jayaraman, Vivek; Laurent, Gilles (2003) Intensity versus identity coding in an olfactory system. Neuron 39:991-1004