The overall goal of our laboratory is to enhance the number of patients that respond to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Recently published clinical trials consistently demonstrate a 15-20% response rate to programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) checkpoint blocking antibodies in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Durable responses and immune correlative analyses from these trials are consistent with the activation of anti-tumor immunity.
We aim to enhance these responses through combination treatment, and explore different combinations of checkpoint blocking antibodies with standard-of-care, targeted and other immunotherapies. One of the major barriers to effective immunotherapy seems to be the presence of immunosuppressive immune cells alongside the anti-tumor immune cells within the tumor. In head and neck cancers, immature myeloid cells and regulatory T-cells are potent suppressors of anti-tumor immunity. Previously our laboratory had fully characterized different models of oral cavity cancer that model human head and neck cancer that have evidence of an activated anti-tumor immune response (T-cell inflamed tumors) and those that do not (non-T-cell inflamed tumors). These models allow our team to explore treatments designed to enhance an existing anti-tumor immune response, as well as treatment designed to activate an anti-tumor immune response that does not already exist. Using laboratory techniques to measure the amount of immune cells infiltrating a tumor, we have shown that granulocytic myeloid cells (gMDSC), but not regulatory T-cells, massively infiltrate tumors with tumor progression in our syngeneic models. This gMDSC infiltration is inversely related with the infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells, such as CD8 T-cells, natural killer cells, mature macrophages and dendritic cells. We previously demonstrated that within both types of tumors, the presence of immunosuppressive tumor infiltrating myeloid cells was not effectively altered by using drugs that block the oncogenic signaling pathways within the tumor cells. This led us to consider other approaches to eliminating gMDSC from tumors. Using techniques to selectively eliminate these gMDSC at different times, we have demonstrated that eliminating gMDSCs from T-cell inflamed tumors completely reverses suppression of T-cell function that normally occurs with tumor progression. This was not true in non-T-cell inflamed tumors. This led us to hypothesize that functional inhibition or elimination of gMDSC could make T-cell inflamed tumors respond to checkpoint inhibition better. We first used techniques only possible in mice to eliminate gMDSC, and found that we could consistency induce complete rejection of T-cell inflamed tumors in mice with combination gMDSC elimination and checkpoint inhibition. As we explored how to make this feasible in patients with head and neck cancer, we used a small molecule inhibitor that selectively inhibits subunits of the signaling protein PI3K that are primarily expressed in immune cells. We found that this indeed blocked suppressive capacity of gMDSC; however, this same treatment also blocked T-cell function to a degree, likely limiting the efficacy of this treatment approach. We are now exploring other means of inhibiting gMDSC infiltration or function in ways that are possible in both mice and patients with head and neck cancer, including the use of antibodies that block the expansion and suppressive capacity of gMDSCs within tumors and drugs that block the chemokine signals that recruit gMDSCs into tumors. These projects are ongoing and a major focus of work in our laboratory. One other important project in our laboratory this year has been the use of checkpoint inhibitors combined with targeted, small molecule inhibitors that make tumor cells more sensitive to effector immune cell killing. Preliminary work for our laboratory suggests that when T-lymphocytes begin to try to kill a target tumor cell, that the tumor cells pauses its cell cycle, possible to allow recovery from the injury. A new drug blocks a kinase that helps the tumor cell pause its cell cycle, and when tumor cells are exposed to this new drug, they become much more sensitive to T-lymphocyte-induced killing. Furthermore, tumor cells seem to become more sensitive to multiple mechanisms of T-lymphocyte killing, including fast, one-on-one killing of high sensitive tumor cells and slower, so called bystander killing of more resistant cells. We are working aggressively in our laboratory to confirm these findings and work out how to best combine such targeted drugs with checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies to best inform early phase clinical trials for patients with advanced head and neck cancer. We are excited to continue our work investigating different combinations of standard-of-care, targeted and immune treatments with checkpoint inhibition, with the ultimate goal of moving each promising combination into early phase clinical trials at the NIH and other academic medical centers.
|Morisada, Megan; Clavijo, Paul E; Moore, Ellen et al. (2018) PD-1 blockade reverses adaptive immune resistance induced by high-dose hypofractionated but not low-dose daily fractionated radiation. Oncoimmunology 7:e1395996|
|Moore, Ellen C; Sun, Lillian; Clavijo, Paul E et al. (2018) Nanocomplex-based TP53 gene therapy promotes anti-tumor immunity through TP53- and STING-dependent mechanisms. Oncoimmunology 7:e1404216|
|Ahn, Julie; Bishop, Justin A; Roden, Richard B S et al. (2018) The PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Laryngoscope 128:E27-E32|
|Friedman, Jay; Morisada, Megan; Sun, Lillian et al. (2018) Inhibition of WEE1 kinase and cell cycle checkpoint activation sensitizes head and neck cancers to natural killer cell therapies. J Immunother Cancer 6:59|
|Zolkind, Paul; Przybylski, Dariusz; Marjanovic, Nemanja et al. (2018) Cancer immunogenomic approach to neoantigen discovery in a checkpoint blockade responsive murine model of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 9:4109-4119|
|Morisada, Megan; Chamberlin, Michael; Allen, Clint (2018) Exploring the rationale for combining ionizing radiation and immune checkpoint blockade in head and neck cancer. Head Neck 40:1321-1334|
|Gadkaree, Shekhar K; Fu, Juan; Sen, Rupashree et al. (2017) Induction of tumor regression by intratumoral STING agonists combined with anti-programmed death-L1 blocking antibody in a preclinical squamous cell carcinoma model. Head Neck 39:1086-1094|
|Davis, Ruth J; Silvin, Christopher; Allen, Clint T (2017) Avoiding phagocytosis-related artifact in myeloid derived suppressor cell T-lymphocyte suppression assays. J Immunol Methods 440:12-18|
|Morisada, Megan; Moore, Ellen C; Hodge, Rachel et al. (2017) Dose-dependent enhancement of T-lymphocyte priming and CTL lysis following ionizing radiation in an engineered model of oral cancer. Oral Oncol 71:87-94|
|Clavijo, Paul E; Moore, Ellen C; Chen, Jianhong et al. (2017) Resistance to CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibition reversed through selective elimination of granulocytic myeloid cells. Oncotarget 8:55804-55820|
Showing the most recent 10 out of 23 publications