The long arm of early life remains one of the most enduring puzzles in human health. To date, two classes of evolutionary models have been proposed to address this puzzle. Developmental constraints models propose that early adversity leads to tradeoffs with somatic investment during development, with long-term, negative consequences for health. Predictive models propose that organisms use early adversity to predict future circumstances, making developmental adjustments that optimize Darwinian fitness in adulthood. The relative merits of these models have been difficult to establish, especially in humans and other long-lived species. Resolving this debate is necessary to understand the developmental origins of health and disease and to identify efficient methods to mitigate early life effects. The primary objective of this proposal is to test predictive and constraints frameworks by characterizing diverse developmental, health, fitness, and aging-related outcomes arising from variation in early life adversity. It accomplishes this objective in a non-human primate model that is offers an excellent comparative system to understand the evolutionary pressures faced by early humans. This system also offers real-time data on several forms of early adversity and multiple longitudinal developmental, behavioral, and health outcomes in response to early adversity. This project tests the central hypotheses that: (i) responses to early adversity are dominated by developmental constraints, leading to restricted somatic investment, delayed reproductive schedules, lower fertility, and accelerated aging; but (ii) these responses can be mitigated by positive social conditions in adulthood.
Aim 1 distinguishes constraints and predictive responses in the juvenile period.
Aim 2 contributes a strong test of predictive and constraints models by testing adult responses in both low and high quality environments.
Aim 3 tests the potential for social support to mitigate the negative effects of early adversity, offering avenues to ameliorate these effects in adulthood. By spanning multiple sources of adversity and multiple aspects of somatic and reproductive health, this project will contribute the most comprehensive test to distinguish predictive and constraints frameworks in any species to date. Establishing which model dominates is critical to predict how environments in adulthood will interact with early adversity to shape adult health, and how to best mitigate responses to early adversity. Specifically, constraints models predict that mitigation should focus on early life. In contrast predictive models posit that optimal mitigation strategies will differ depending on which sources of early adversity individuals experienced. By disentangling responses to adversity, this project will improve basic understanding of the developmental origins of health and disease and lend key insight into how different sources of adversity interact with good and bad conditions in adulthood to shape adult health and rates of aging.

Public Health Relevance

The proposed research is relevant to public health because it tests how two key factors?harsh conditions in early life and poor social circumstances in adulthood?predict individual health and physical functioning across the life course. These questions are addressed by leveraging real-time, longitudinal data on adversity in early life, social conditions, and multiple measures of physical functioning in a wild primate population. This population offers fine-scale data and a simplified model of complex human societies, without the complexities of human health risk behaviors. The project is highly relevant to NIA's mission of understanding processes that contribute to health and well being across the life span, and to NICHD's mission to help children achieve their full potential for healthy and productive lives, free from disease or disability.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01AG053330-01A1
Application #
9383290
Study Section
Biobehavioral Regulation, Learning and Ethology Study Section (BRLE)
Program Officer
Gerald, Melissa S
Project Start
2017-08-01
Project End
2022-05-31
Budget Start
2017-08-01
Budget End
2018-05-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2017
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Notre Dame
Department
Biology
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
824910376
City
Notre Dame
State
IN
Country
United States
Zip Code
46556
Gesquiere, Laurence R; Pugh, Mya; Alberts, Susan C et al. (2018) Estimation of energetic condition in wild baboons using fecal thyroid hormone determination. Gen Comp Endocrinol 260:9-17
Alberts, Susan C (2018) Social influences on survival and reproduction: Insights from a long-term study of wild baboons. J Anim Ecol :
Gesquiere, Laurence R; Altmann, Jeanne; Archie, Elizabeth A et al. (2018) Interbirth intervals in wild baboons: Environmental predictors and hormonal correlates. Am J Phys Anthropol 166:107-126
Lea, Amanda J; Tung, Jenny; Archie, Elizabeth A et al. (2017) Developmental plasticity: Bridging research in evolution and human health. Evol Med Public Health 2017:162-175