The goal of this study is to use a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) test to determine if assessment of proximal femur microarchitecture has added value as a biomarker of bone quality and hip fracture risk. Hip or proximal femur fracture is the most devastating type of osteoporotic fracture, affecting 300,000 Americans and accounting for $12 billion in healthcare costs annually. There is a critical need for an improved method to assess proximal femur bone quality in vivo. 54% of women who suffer hip fractures are misclassified by dual- energy x-ray absorptiometry as not osteoporotic. And though the FRAX calculator, clinical factors (e.g. fall risk, immobility), and macrostructural hip assessment have proven highly valuable, the detection of subjects at risk for hip fracture remains a challenge. Bone microarchitecture, a key determinant of bone strength included in the disease definition of osteoporosis, has never been studied in the proximal femur in vivo because of a lack of means to assess it. We have achieved a technical breakthrough: using a novel 26 element receive detector (which boosts signal-to-noise ratio), we have successfully imaged individual trabeculae composing proximal femur microarchitecture on a clinical 3 T MRI scanner in vivo. We will now apply this tool in a clinical study.
Our specific aims (SA) are to: 1) Determine how proximal femur microarchitecture changes with aging in post- menopausal women without fracture (n = 100). We hypothesize that higher age will correlate with lower femoral neck cortical thickness, trabecular thickness, number, connectivity, plate-to-rod ratio, and lower whole proximal femur stiffness and ultimate strength. 2) Determine how proximal femur microarchitecture is deranged in post-menopausal women with femoral neck fracture (n = 100). We hypothesize that fracture cases will demonstrate lower femoral neck cortical thickness, trabecular thickness, number, connectivity, plate-to-rod ratio, and lower whole proximal femur stiffness and ultimate strength compared to SA1 controls. 3) Determine the added value of microarchitecture, beyond FRAX/known clinical risk factors, for classifying subjects without and with hip fracture. Our main hypothesis is that adding microarchitecture to a baseline logistic regression model containing FRAX and clinical risk factors will improve model accuracy for classification of fracture status. Our secondary hypothesis is that a model of microarchitecture, FRAX, and clinical risk factors will be more accurate for classification of fracture status than a model of macrostructure, FRAX, and clinical risk factors. If successful, this study will: 1) provid new insight into the pathogenesis and means for prevention of hip fracture; and 2) determine whether microarchitectural assessment allows detection of high-risk hip fracture patients who currently escape detection. If validated in a longitudinal study, this MRI test could be used as an additional research/clinical care tool to determine whether an individual should or should not receive therapy, or be suitable for clinical trial enrollment. It could also be used as a novel too to monitor the effects of different interventions on proximal femur microarchitecture and strength.
The detection of subjects at risk for osteoporotic hip fracture remains a challenge. Our goal is to apply a new, high-resolution MRI test to determine: 1) how deterioration in proximal femur microarchitecture contributes to hip fracture risk and 2) whether assessment of proximal femur microarchitecture has added value, beyond current methods, for the detection of subjects with poor proximal femur bone quality in need of osteoporosis therapy.
|Rajapakse, Chamith S; Chang, Gregory (2018) Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16:657-664|
|Chang, Gregory; Rajapakse, Chamith S; Chen, Cheng et al. (2018) 3-T MR Imaging of Proximal Femur Microarchitecture in Subjects with and without Fragility Fracture and Nonosteoporotic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density. Radiology 287:608-619|
|Griffin, Lindsay M; Honig, Stephen; Chen, Cheng et al. (2017) 7T MRI of distal radius trabecular bone microarchitecture: How trabecular bone quality varies depending on distance from end-of-bone. J Magn Reson Imaging 45:872-878|
|Chang, Gregory; Boone, Sean; Martel, Dimitri et al. (2017) MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture. J Magn Reson Imaging 46:323-337|
|Rajapakse, Chamith S; Hotca, Alexandra; Newman, Benjamin T et al. (2017) Patient-specific Hip Fracture Strength Assessment with Microstructural MR Imaging-based Finite Element Modeling. Radiology 283:854-861|
|Agten, Christoph A; Ramme, Austin J; Kang, Stella et al. (2017) Cost-effectiveness of Virtual Bone Strength Testing in Osteoporosis Screening Programs for Postmenopausal Women in the United States. Radiology 285:506-517|
|Chang, Gregory; Rajapakse, Chamith S; Regatte, Ravinder R et al. (2015) 3 Tesla MRI detects deterioration in proximal femur microarchitecture and strength in long-term glucocorticoid users compared with controls. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1489-96|
|Chang, Gregory; Hotca-Cho, Alexandra; Rusinek, Henry et al. (2015) Measurement reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element analysis of proximal femur microarchitecture for in vivo assessment of bone strength. MAGMA 28:407-12|
|Hotca, Alexandra; Rajapakse, Chamith S; Cheng, Chen et al. (2015) In vivo measurement reproducibility of femoral neck microarchitectural parameters derived from 3T MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:1339-45|