Investigators studying illicit drug use and related HIV risk face unique ethical challenges. Intoxication, long term drug use, or advanced stages of HIV/AIDS can impair consent capacity. Involvement in criminal activities to purchase drugs and diagnosis of HIV/AIDS make participants especially vulnerable to breaches in confidentiality that may result in criminal prosecution, social stigmatization, or loss of employment. The need for money to purchase drugs or ethnic and economic health disparities may heighten susceptibility to coercion from cash or treatment compensation for research participation. Participants in RCT designs may suffer withdrawal symptoms during detoxification or side effects when experimental treatments interact with street drugs. Dissemination of research results may further stigmatize or sustain societal prejudices against historically oppressed groups. Through focus groups, in-depth interviews, and structured interview surveys, this research aims to explore the hopes, values, and fears that multiply vulnerable illicit drug users bring to research ethics practices. This collaborative project uniting the strengths of the Fordham University Center for Ethics Education and the community based substance abuse and HIV/AIDS experience of the Hispanic Health Council, will examine in both depth and breath the attitudes of street drug users towards research risks and benefits, informed consent, confidentiality, and use of incentives in research on the epidemiology, social correlates, and treatments for drug abuse and HIV related risks. How gender and ethnicity influence these attitudes will also be examined. Long-term goals of this project are to identify ethical concerns among economically disadvantaged, ethnically diverse illicit street drug users that will inform and enhance drug use and HIV risk research in ways that reflect the values and merit the trust of participants. ? ? ?

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01DA015649-01A2
Application #
6892549
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-AARR-F (02))
Program Officer
Flanzer, Jerry
Project Start
2005-09-20
Project End
2008-07-31
Budget Start
2005-09-20
Budget End
2006-07-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2005
Total Cost
$492,573
Indirect Cost
Name
Fordham University
Department
Psychology
Type
Other Domestic Higher Education
DUNS #
071011019
City
Bronx
State
NY
Country
United States
Zip Code
10458
Urada, Lianne A; Simmons, Janie; Wong, Betty et al. (2016) A human rights-focused HIV intervention for sex workers in Metro Manila, Philippines: evaluation of effects in a quantitative pilot study. Int J Public Health 61:945-957
Basta, Tania B; Stambaugh, Teena; Fisher, Celia B (2015) Efficacy of an Educational Intervention to Increase Consent for HIV Testing in Rural Appalachia. Ethics Behav 25:125-149
Broaddus, Michelle R; Marsch, Lisa A (2015) Risks and benefits of text message-delivered and small group-delivered sexual health interventions among African American women in the Midwestern U.S. Ethics Behav 25:146-168
Fisher, Celia B (2011) Addiction research ethics and the Belmont principles: do drug users have a different moral voice? Subst Use Misuse 46:728-41
Fisher, Celia B (2010) Enhancing HIV vaccine trial consent preparedness among street drug users. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 5:65-80
Oransky, Matthew; Fisher, Celia B; Mahadevan, Meena et al. (2009) Barriers and opportunities for recruitment for nonintervention studies on HIV risk: perspectives of street drug users. Subst Use Misuse 44:1642-59
Fisher, Celia B; Oransky, Matthew; Mahadevan, Meena et al. (2008) Marginalized populations and drug addiction research: realism, mistrust, and misconception. IRB 30:1-9