Based on the National Center for Health Statistics, Class II malocclusions occur in 15-20 percent of U.S. white children ages 6-11. However, there are few systematic, prospective longitudinal studies evaluting the effects of early (phase 1) treatment of this problem and controlling for the growth and maturational factors which may be associated with therapeutic outcome. This investigation will compare the treatment results of two commonly used therapies with differing modes of action on Class II division 1 malocclusion: head gear, and the Frankel functional appliance. The sample of children will consist of eighty white male and female patients selected in mid-to late childhood equally divided, and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups which are subcategorized by severity of malocclusion and skeletal maturity. Data collected will consist of a series of measures made at different time periods. Evaluation of cephalometric data will involve comparison of linear and angular measurements as well as an improved method for detecting growth from superimposition on cranial, maxillary and mandibular bases. Dental casts taken quarterly will be measured for changes during treatment. Detailed growth, maturational and hormonal data will be collected to determine the growth correlates of therapeutic outcome during the treatment period: monthly anthropometric measurements, including a new precise measure of lower limb length; and monthly measurement of the salivary and biannual measurement of the serum concentration of the adrenal androgen, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), which has been associated with the mid-growth spurt of childhood. Hypotheses to be evaluated concern those associated with therapeutic outcome of the Frankel appliance on mandibular growth versus the headgear (which directly operates on the maxilla) controlling for skeletal maturity and severity of malocclusion. Other hypotheses involving the effects of variation of growth, maturation and hormonal change during the period of treatment will be evaluated in order to determine more completely the correlates of the efficacy of early treatment.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01DE008722-02
Application #
3222600
Study Section
(SRC)
Project Start
1988-09-01
Project End
1992-08-31
Budget Start
1989-09-01
Budget End
1990-08-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1989
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Pennsylvania
Department
Type
Schools of Dentistry/Oral Hygn
DUNS #
042250712
City
Philadelphia
State
PA
Country
United States
Zip Code
19104
Efstratiadis, Stella; Baumrind, Sheldon; Shofer, Frances et al. (2005) Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:607-18
Ashmore, Jennifer L; Kurland, Brenda F; King, Gregory J et al. (2002) A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:18-29; discussion 29-30
Ghafari, J; Shofer, F S; Jacobsson-Hunt, U et al. (1998) Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:51-61
Ghafari, J; King, G J; Tulloch, J F (1998) Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion--comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clin Orthod Res 1:107-17
Ghafari, J (1998) Timing the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion--clinical and research considerations. Clin Orthod Res 1:118-29
Cortella, S; Shofer, F S; Ghafari, J (1997) Transverse development of the jaws: norms for the posteroanterior cephalometric analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112:519-22
Ghafari, J; Jacobsson-Hunt, U; Higgins-Barber, K et al. (1996) Identification of condylar anatomy affects the evaluation of mandibular growth: guidelines for accurate reporting and research. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 109:645-52
Ghafari, J G; Shofer, F S; Laster, L L et al. (1995) Monitoring growth during orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1:165-75
Ghafari, J; Jacobsson-Hunt, U; Markowitz, D L et al. (1994) Changes of arch width in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106:496-502