The termination of transcription for poly(A) mRNA transcription units in eukaryotes is generally presumed to be a 2 step process in which cleavage/polyadenylation of the RNA (step l) facilitates the actual termination of transcription (step 2) at an appropriate down-stream signal. It is not known whether it is the assembly of a functional cleavage/polyadenylation complex on the RNA, or the reaction that it carries out (cleavage), that confers on the RNA polymerase the predisposition to terminate. This will be tested by inserting self- cleaving RNA sequences into transcription units so as to uncouple cleavage and poly(A) complex assembly. It is also not known whether the two steps are obligatorily coupled. Does cleavage always predispose to termination? This will be tested by functionally characterizing the chicken globin beta-epsilon gene 3 flanking region which appears to be defective in transcription termination. The beta-epsilon region contains what appears to be a transcriptional arrest site which is unable to function as a terminator by releasing the arrested polymerases. Nuclear run-on transcription results indicate that after the polymerases traverse the beta-epsilon gene poly(A) site they stack up behind the arrest site without dissociating efficiently from the template. The poly(A) and arrest sites of the beta-epsilon gene will be tested in combination with poly(A) and pause sites from other genes in order to localize and characterize the defect. The other side of the obligatory coupling question is whether the signals can ever operate independently of each other. The nature of the downstream signal, in particular, remains ambiguous. Transcriptional pausing is likely to be a common denominator of such signals but whether, in special circumstances, some of the signals may be designed as stand-alone terminators remains a significant possibility. A new experimental approach which distinguishes between pausing and termination will be used to determine whether the unusually effective downstream signals of the beta-H terminator can function as stand-alone terminators. It has been postulated that a minimum spacing between the poly(A) site and the down-stream elements is required to facilitate tracking. Preliminary results suggest that the beta-H gene does not have such a requirement. The minimum allowable spacing for the beta-H terminator will be determined to shed light on this issue. A major problem in the study of termination is the lack of suitably convenient techniques. A major goal of this proposal is to refine the design of several novel transfection vectors which have been developed for the study of termination. One is for use in run-on transcription and places two G-free cassettes of different-length under the control of the SV40 early promoter. Insertions are made between the two cassettes and termination is assayed by Tl RNase digesting the run-on transcripts and separating them on a gel (G-free RNA is immune to T1 RNase). A functional terminator will prevent transcription of the second cassette. The other vector is a CAT expression vector that operates on the principle of promoter interference. Terminators are recognized by their ability to rescue CAT expression by terminating transcription from an interfering upstream promoter.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM050863-03
Application #
2459530
Study Section
Molecular Biology Study Section (MBY)
Project Start
1995-08-01
Project End
1999-07-31
Budget Start
1997-08-01
Budget End
1998-07-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
1997
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
University of California Los Angeles
Department
Chemistry
Type
Schools of Arts and Sciences
DUNS #
119132785
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90095
Rigo, Frank; Martinson, Harold G (2009) Polyadenylation releases mRNA from RNA polymerase II in a process that is licensed by splicing. RNA 15:823-36
Rigo, Frank; Martinson, Harold G (2008) Functional coupling of last-intron splicing and 3'-end processing to transcription in vitro: the poly(A) signal couples to splicing before committing to cleavage. Mol Cell Biol 28:849-62
Nag, Anita; Narsinh, Kazim; Martinson, Harold G (2007) The poly(A)-dependent transcriptional pause is mediated by CPSF acting on the body of the polymerase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:662-9
Nag, Anita; Narsinh, Kazim; Kazerouninia, Amir et al. (2006) The conserved AAUAAA hexamer of the poly(A) signal can act alone to trigger a stable decrease in RNA polymerase II transcription velocity. RNA 12:1534-44
Rigo, Frank; Kazerouninia, Amir; Nag, Anita et al. (2005) The RNA tether from the poly(A) signal to the polymerase mediates coupling of transcription to cleavage and polyadenylation. Mol Cell 20:733-45
Park, Noh Jin; Tsao, David C; Martinson, Harold G (2004) The two steps of poly(A)-dependent termination, pausing and release, can be uncoupled by truncation of the RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal repeat domain. Mol Cell Biol 24:4092-103
Kim, Steven J; Martinson, Harold G (2003) Poly(A)-dependent transcription termination: continued communication of the poly(A) signal with the polymerase is required long after extrusion in vivo. J Biol Chem 278:41691-701
Orozco, Ian J; Kim, Steven J; Martinson, Harold G (2002) The poly(A) signal, without the assistance of any downstream element, directs RNA polymerase II to pause in vivo and then to release stochastically from the template. J Biol Chem 277:42899-911
Tran, D P; Kim, S J; Park, N J et al. (2001) Mechanism of poly(A) signal transduction to RNA polymerase II in vitro. Mol Cell Biol 21:7495-508
Chao, L C; Jamil, A; Kim, S J et al. (1999) Assembly of the cleavage and polyadenylation apparatus requires about 10 seconds in vivo and is faster for strong than for weak poly(A) sites. Mol Cell Biol 19:5588-600

Showing the most recent 10 out of 11 publications