As many as 60 percent of Americans do not engage in regular physical activity and 25 percent are completely inactive. The risk of cardiovascular disease is almost doubled among people who are physically inactive, comparable to the risks associated with increased systolic blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and elevated serum cholesterol. To make an impact on physical activity prevalence at the population level requires a research focus at the interface between clinical efficacy trials and large-scale dissemination studies. Studies at this interface must use proven interventions that are simultaneously effective and cost-efficient. Such interventions are the focus of this proposal. The objective of this study is to determine the differential effect of intervention delivery channel (phone versus print versus wait list control) on physical activity adoption and maintenance in previously sedentary adults. Both delivery channels have been found to be effective, but telephone-based interventions require more commitment on the part of the subjects and are more labor intensive than print-based interventions. Thus, we will conduct a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing three groups: 1) telephone-based motivationally- tailored individualized feedback; 2) print-based, motivationally- tailored individualized feedback; 3) minimal contact waiting list control condition (receive intervention after 12 months as controls). Two hundred and twenty-eight healthy, sedentary women and men ages 18-65 will be randomly assigned to one of the two interventions or the waiting list control condition. The two intervention arms will be matched with respect to frequency and content of contact. Data will be collected at baseline, 6, and 12 months using well-established physical activity and physical performance measures, as well as a comprehensive set of psychosocial questionnaires. Our primary hypothesis is that individuals randomized to either phone or print conditions will exhibit significantly higher levels of phys ical activity participation at 6 and 12 months than individuals in the waiting list control condition. And, in addition, that subjects randomized to the telephone condition will exhibit significantly higher levels of physical activity participation at 6 and 12 months than those in the print condition. Additional questions of interest include evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of the two intervention delivery approaches, each in relation to each other and to the wait list control group and examination of potential moderators and mediators of the intervention-physical activity relationship. This study will contribute important information regarding the relative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two interventions, each of which can be utilized for widespread public health dissemination.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01HL064342-03
Application #
6527328
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-RPHB-2 (01))
Program Officer
Salive, Marcel
Project Start
2000-08-17
Project End
2004-07-31
Budget Start
2002-08-01
Budget End
2003-07-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2002
Total Cost
$470,076
Indirect Cost
Name
Miriam Hospital
Department
Type
DUNS #
039318308
City
Providence
State
RI
Country
United States
Zip Code
02906
Kim, Chanmin; Daniels, Michael J; Marcus, Bess H et al. (2017) A framework for Bayesian nonparametric inference for causal effects of mediation. Biometrics 73:401-409
Daiello, Lori A; Gongvatana, Assawin; Dunsiger, Shira et al. (2015) Association of fish oil supplement use with preservation of brain volume and cognitive function. Alzheimers Dement 11:226-35
Williams, David M; Dunsiger, Shira; Jennings, Ernestine G et al. (2012) Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10-min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity? Ann Behav Med 44:43-51
Williams, David M; Papandonatos, George D; Jennings, Ernestine G et al. (2011) Does tailoring on additional theoretical constructs enhance the efficacy of a print-based physical activity promotion intervention? Health Psychol 30:432-41
Napolitano, Melissa A; Borradaile, Kelley E; Lewis, Beth A et al. (2010) Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial. Contemp Clin Trials 31:514-23
LaFrance Jr, W C; Keitner, G I; Papandonatos, G D et al. (2010) Pilot pharmacologic randomized controlled trial for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Neurology 75:1166-73
Ries, Amy V; Dunsiger, Shira; Marcus, Bess H (2009) Physical activity interventions and changes in perceived home and facility environments. Prev Med 49:515-7
Napolitano, Melissa A; Papandonatos, George D; Lewis, Beth A et al. (2008) Mediators of physical activity behavior change: a multivariate approach. Health Psychol 27:409-18
Williams, David M; Matthews, Charles E; Rutt, Candace et al. (2008) Interventions to increase walking behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40:S567-73
Sevick, Mary Ann; Napolitano, Melissa A; Papandonatos, George D et al. (2007) Cost-effectiveness of alternative approaches for motivating activity in sedentary adults: results of Project STRIDE. Prev Med 45:54-61

Showing the most recent 10 out of 20 publications