We are proposing a five-year study of adults with major depressive disorder refractory to treatment with fluoxetine. We want to address the basic clinical question: once a fluoxetine trial of adequate duration and dosage has failed, what should be tried next? Should one increase the dosage of fluoxetine, or maintain the same dosage and add either low-dose of a tricylic antidepressant or lithium? The scope of our study is to compare the efficacy of these three different treatment strategies in this area in great need of controlled research. The critical clinical issue is whether the use of adjunctive medications offers any additional benefit given the popularity and increasing use of this strategy by clinicians. An additional aim of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of these treatments. The study involves the enrollment over 48 months of 500 patients with major depression who will be treated openly with fluoxetine 20 mg/day for 8 weeks. The subjects will be drawn from an outpatient sample of patients with major depressive disorder, diagnosed by the use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R - Patient Edition (Spitzer et al, 1989), and with an initial 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) (Hamilton, 1960) score greater than 16. If these depressed patients fail to respond to this 8-week open treatment with fluoxetine, they then will become eligible for a four-week, three-arm, double-blind, triple-dummy phase of the study where they will be randomized to one of three different treatments: fluoxetine 40-60 mg/day, fluoxetine 20 mg and desipramine 25-50 mg/day, and fluoxetine 20 mg and lithium 300-600 mg/day. Refractoriness to treatment will be defined as a failure to achieve a 50% or greater reduction in the HAM-D-17 scores and a HAM-D-17 score greater than 10 at the time of enrollment. There will be a prospective stratification of the patients for the randomization based on the fact that they will be either partial responders or non responders: partial responders will be considered those patients who had experienced a > 25% and < 50% reduction in their HAM-D-17 score or have a HAM-D-17 score or have a HAM-D-17 score < 16; non responders will be considered those patients who have had a less than 25% reduction in their HAM-D-17 score from the beginning of treatment and have a HAM-D-17 score greater than 16. The study extends our previous research on drug therapy strategies for treatment-refractory depression and examines the efficacy of three different treatments in a depressed population whose refractoriness to the same antidepressant has been defined prospectively rather than historically or retrospectively.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01MH048483-02
Application #
3388010
Study Section
Treatment Development and Assessment Research Review Committee (TDA)
Project Start
1992-06-01
Project End
1997-05-31
Budget Start
1993-06-01
Budget End
1994-05-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
1993
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
Department
Type
DUNS #
City
Boston
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02199
Candrian, Michele; Schwartz, Faye; Farabaugh, Amy et al. (2008) Personality disorders and perceived stress in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res 160:184-91
Farabaugh, Amy; Mischoulon, David; Schwartz, Faye et al. (2007) Dysfunctional attitudes and personality disorder comorbidity during long-term treatment of MDD. Depress Anxiety 24:433-9
Candrian, Michele; Farabaugh, Amy; Pizzagalli, Diego A et al. (2007) Perceived stress and cognitive vulnerability mediate the effects of personality disorder comorbidity on treatment outcome in major depressive disorder: a path analysis study. J Nerv Ment Dis 195:729-37
Fraguas, Renerio; Iosifescu, Dan V; Bankier, Bettina et al. (2007) Major depressive disorder with anger attacks and cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Psychiatry Med 37:99-111
Papakostas, George I; Petersen, Timothy; Homberger, Caitlin H et al. (2007) Hopelessness as a predictor of non-response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder. Ann Clin Psychiatry 19:5-8
Iosifescu, Dan V; Renshaw, Perry F; Dougherty, Darin D et al. (2007) Major depressive disorder with anger attacks and subcortical MRI white matter hyperintensities. J Nerv Ment Dis 195:175-8
Papakostas, George I; Petersen, Timothy; Sklarsky, Katherine G et al. (2007) Timing of clinical improvement and symptom resolution in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res 149:195-200
Iosifescu, Dan V; Renshaw, Perry F; Lyoo, In Kyoon et al. (2006) Brain white-matter hyperintensities and treatment outcome in major depressive disorder. Br J Psychiatry 188:180-5
Fraguas Jr, Renerio; Papakostas, George I; Mischoulon, David et al. (2006) Anger attacks in major depressive disorder and serum levels of homocysteine. Biol Psychiatry 60:270-4
Denninger, John W; Papakostas, George I; Mahal, Yasmin et al. (2006) Somatic symptoms in outpatients with major depressive disorder treated with fluoxetine. Psychosomatics 47:348-52

Showing the most recent 10 out of 60 publications