The need for a healthy and productive workforce in a global economy has brought renewed interest in studies of how changes in corporate benefit policies for mental health treatment affect broader healthcare utilization and the productivity of workers. The goal of our study is to examine the effects of an innovative mental health benefit design change by a large national corporation. Specifically, restrictions on mental health treatment were reduced, patient out-of-pocket costs were decreased, and a company-wide effort was made to destigmatize mental health treatment. Concurrently, a network of mental health providers was initiated, the goal of which was to offer employees treatment options from quality providers. Using claims data for medical, pharmaceutical, and mental health in conjunction with linked employee and provider records in the pre- and post-benefit change period, we propose to examine the following research questions: 1) How did the overall benefit policy change affect mental health treatment initiation, intensity, and quality? 2) How did the overall benefit policy change impact non-mental health costs? 3) How did the benefit policy change impact short-term disability. 4) To what extent are changes in treatment intensity due to selecting providers that already expouse the company's treatment philosophy (contracting effect) or changes in provider's behavior in order to join the network (adaption effect)? 5) What are the costs of selective contracting to patients and providers? 6) Were quality, efficient providers selected? Adopting a comprehensive strategy that improves access to treatment of mental illness may have important long run benefits to employers and employees. Moreover, selective contracting has the potential to reward efficient providers and may be less costly and controversial than attempting to change the way providers treat patients through utilization management. Our study will offer lessons from which other purchasers, including the federal government, may learn.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01MH062114-01A2
Application #
6434140
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZMH1-SRV-C (01))
Program Officer
Rupp, Agnes
Project Start
2001-09-14
Project End
2003-08-13
Budget Start
2001-09-14
Budget End
2002-08-13
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2001
Total Cost
$183,750
Indirect Cost
Name
Northwestern University at Chicago
Department
Type
Organized Research Units
DUNS #
City
Evanston
State
IL
Country
United States
Zip Code
60201
Lindrooth, Richard C; Lo Sasso, Anthony T; Lurie, Ithai Z (2006) The effect of distance to provider on employee response to changes in mental health benefits. Health Econ 15:1133-41
Sasso, Anthony T Lo; Lurie, Ithai Z; Lee, Jhee Un et al. (2006) The effects of expanded mental health benefits on treatment costs. J Ment Health Policy Econ 9:25-33
Lo Sasso, Anthony T; Lindrooth, Richard C; Lurie, Ithai Z et al. (2006) Expanded mental health benefits and outpatient depression treatment intensity. Med Care 44:366-72
Lindrooth, Richard C; Lo Sasso, Anthony T; Lurie, Ithai Z (2005) The effect of expanded mental health benefits on treatment initiation and specialist utilization. Health Serv Res 40:1092-107