A major challenge facing mental health services for young people is how best to integrate important data from different informants, such as parents, teachers, and the young people themselves. To meet this challenge, the proposed project will develop and test statistical models for integrating multiple sources of data in the assessment of psychopathology. The long-range goal is to improve services by helping mental health workers make more accurate clinical decisions. Practitioners often collect information from multiple sources prior to making key decisions about the best ways to help their clients, e.g., no treatment, further evaluation, limited intervention, or one or more full-scale interventions. Many studies show disagreement among different sources of data about young people's problems. Carefully designed research is needed to optimize use and integration of data from multiple sources. Standardized instruments are important contributors to assessment, prevention, treatment, and evaluation of outcomes. Using empirically based standardized assessment instruments and DSM diagnostic interviews; the investigators will analyze data on psychopathology collected from multiple sources in national samples from the U.S., Holland, and Australia. Classification/regression tree analysis will be used to establish cutpoints on combined multi-informant data for maximizing DSM diagnostic accuracy as an external criterion. Other statistical models will include those based on variable-centered approaches (e.g., models developed to analyze multitrait-multimethod matrices for continuous observed and latent variables), as well as those based on individual-centered approaches (e.g., latent class models for categorical observed and latent variables). External validation analyses of DSM diagnoses and other important criteria will be used to test the accuracy of results obtained from internal validation analyses. The power of different statistical models to detect differences related to clinical status, DSM diagnoses, and other indices of psychopathology will be tested. The findings are expected to advance knowledge and methods for assessing youth psychopathology that will substantially improve use of essential multisource data for mental health services.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Type
Small Research Grants (R03)
Project #
1R03MH064474-01A2
Application #
6683848
Study Section
Biobehavioral and Behavioral Processes 3 (BBBP)
Program Officer
Bourdon, Karen H
Project Start
2003-07-01
Project End
2005-06-30
Budget Start
2003-07-01
Budget End
2004-06-30
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
2003
Total Cost
$75,750
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Vermont & St Agric College
Department
Psychiatry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
066811191
City
Burlington
State
VT
Country
United States
Zip Code
05405
Lohman, Matthew C; Mezuk, Briana (2013) Frailty and depression: comorbidity in the context of imperfect measurement. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:474
Mezuk, Briana; Lohman, Matthew; Dumenci, Levent et al. (2012) Are Depression and Frailty Overlapping Syndromes in Mid- and Late-life? A Latent Variable Analysis. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry :
Dumenci, Levent (2011) The Psychometric Latent Agreement Model (PLAM) for Discrete Latent Variables Measured by Multiple Items. Organ Res Methods 14:91-115
Dumenci, Levent; Achenbach, Thomas M; Windle, Michael (2011) Measuring Context-Specific and Cross-Contextual Components of Hierarchical Constructs. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 33:3-10
Rettew, David C; Lynch, Alicia Doyle; Achenbach, Thomas M et al. (2009) Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 18:169-84
Achenbach, Thomas M; Krukowski, Rebecca A; Dumenci, Levent et al. (2005) Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations. Psychol Bull 131:361-82
Achenbach, Thomas M; Bernstein, Amit; Dumenci, Levent (2005) DSM-oriented scales and statistically based syndromes for ages 18 to 59: linking taxonomic paradigms to facilitate multitaxonomic approaches. J Pers Assess 84:49-63