: Obesity is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Unfortunately, the traditional approach to obesity does not achieve satisfactory, sustained weight loss. Alternatively, the most commonly performed bariatric operations result in significantly reduced body weight sustained for at least 15 years and remarkable mprovements in comorbid conditions. The recent growth in the performance of bariatric procedures has been unprecedented, largely influenced by the development of minimally invasive techniques and increased patient and provider awareness of the potential benefits of the procedure. However, the acceptance of the procedure has been limited because of questions regarding its effectiveness in the population at large, public reporting of postoperative deaths and complications at leading medical centers and because of cost control considerations. Assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric procedures is problematic because there have been no adequate evaluations of outcome in the general population. Furthermore, the role of these procedures in higher risk patients (i.e older or more debilitated) is even less established. To address the question of bariatric procedure safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness we propose the following study utilizing Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) nationwide, Part B claims database. Over 20% of all hospitalized patients are CMS beneficiaries and while only 10% are under the age of 65, this younger, medically disabled group includes many patients who undergo bariatric surgery.
The specific aims of this research are to: 1. Determine the population-level risk of adverse outcomes following bariatric surgical procedures. 2. Evaluate patient and provider factors associated with adverse outcome to help individualize risk assessments for patients being considered for bariatric procedures. 3. Perform a modeled cost effectiveness analysis of bariatric procedures compared to non-surgical approaches.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Type
Exploratory/Developmental Grants (R21)
Project #
5R21DK069677-02
Application #
7015561
Study Section
Health Services Organization and Delivery Study Section (HSOD)
Program Officer
Everhart, James
Project Start
2005-02-15
Project End
2008-01-31
Budget Start
2006-02-01
Budget End
2008-01-31
Support Year
2
Fiscal Year
2006
Total Cost
$148,037
Indirect Cost
Name
University of Washington
Department
Surgery
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
605799469
City
Seattle
State
WA
Country
United States
Zip Code
98195
Wang, Bruce C M; Wong, Edwin S; Alfonso-Cristancho, Rafael et al. (2014) Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgical procedures for the treatment of severe obesity. Eur J Health Econ 15:253-63
Lin, Vincent W; Wong, Edwin S; Wright, Andrew et al. (2013) Association between health-related quality of life and body mass after adjustable gastric banding: a nonlinear approach. Value Health 16:823-9
Lin, Vincent W; Wright, Andrew; Flum, David R et al. (2013) Patients' experience and outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in Washington state. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:701-5
Kwon, Steve; Wang, Bruce; Wong, Edwin et al. (2013) The impact of accreditation on safety and cost of bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9:617-22
Flum, David R; Kwon, Steve; MacLeod, Kara et al. (2011) The use, safety and cost of bariatric surgery before and after Medicare's national coverage decision. Ann Surg 254:860-5
Salem, Leon; Devlin, Allison; Sullivan, Sean D et al. (2008) Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic gastric bypass, adjustable gastric banding, and nonoperative weight loss interventions. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:26-32
Flum, David R; Salem, Leon; Elrod, Jo Ann Broeckel et al. (2005) Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 294:1903-8