Ischemic Heart Disease, and primarily Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is the most common cause of death in the United States and in the majority of western industrialized countries (Fraser, 1986, NHLBl 1992). Epidemiologic studies of Coronary Heart Disease have consistently demonstrated that the majority of these deaths occur outside the hospital, are sudden or within one hour of onset of symptoms (Simon ,1972, NHLBl 1992). Yet at least 50% of patients report a delay in seeking medical care of 3-4 hours and one- third of patients may delay longer than 12 hours. (Hackett and Caseem, 1969, Herlitz, 1991). Furthermore, treatment with thrombolytic therapy has now demonstrated evidence for improval in survival rates ranging from 20- 30% when provided early in the course of an evolving MI. However, one- third of patients with acute myocardial infarction have not been eligible for thrombolysis, and 30% of this group were ineligible due to late presentation to the hospital. (Anderson and Willerson, 1993). These early minutes and hours from acute onset of symptoms to receipt of definitive medical care are critical for purposes of 1) preventing or treating fatal arrhythmias (ventricular fibrillation) and 2) for providing the best opportunity for thrombolytic therapy with reperfusion and reduction in myocardial tissue damage. (ACS, AHA Task Force Report, 1990) Large scale efforts to reduce delay in treatment for acute myocardial infarction are now clearly a priority. The objective of this Community Intervention to Reduce Myocardial Infarction Delay is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of a community-based intervention to reduce delay time for treatment of symptoms and signs of an MI with emphasis on reducing patient decision time to seek care. Six to twelve matched community pairs will be randomized to receive a community-wide intervention over two study years. An on-going hospital record surveillance of rule-out Ml's will be conducted to evaluate the changes in delay time as well as changes in other secondary endpoints (ER visits, EMS use , and out-of -hospital deaths) related to the intervention. The proposed study will provide the opportunity to assess the effects of a multi-factorial intervention to reduce pre-hospital delay with a sufficiently large sample size from geographically representative samples of communities.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Type
Research Project--Cooperative Agreements (U01)
Project #
5U01HL053149-05
Application #
2714078
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZHL1-CCT-G (M3))
Project Start
1994-08-15
Project End
2000-05-31
Budget Start
1998-06-01
Budget End
2000-05-31
Support Year
5
Fiscal Year
1998
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
New England Research Institute
Department
Type
DUNS #
153914080
City
Watertown
State
MA
Country
United States
Zip Code
02472
Goff Jr, David C; Mitchell, Paul; Finnegan, John et al. (2004) Knowledge of heart attack symptoms in 20 US communities. Results from the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment Community Trial. Prev Med 38:85-93
Hutchings, Caroline B; Mann, N Clay; Daya, Mohamud et al. (2004) Patients with chest pain calling 9-1-1 or self-transporting to reach definitive care: which mode is quicker? Am Heart J 147:35-41
Osganian, Stavroula K; Zapka, Jane G; Feldman, Henry A et al. (2002) Use of emergency medical services for suspected acute cardiac ischemia among demographic and clinical patient subgroups: the REACT trial. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment. Prehosp Emerg Care 6:175-85
Zapka, J G; Oakes, J M; Simons-Morton, D G et al. (2000) Missed opportunities to impact fast response to AMI symptoms. Patient Educ Couns 40:67-82
Hedges, J R; Feldman, H A; Bittner, V et al. (2000) Impact of community intervention to reduce patient delay time on use of reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction: rapid early action for coronary treatment (REACT) trial. REACT Study Group. Acad Emerg Med 7:862-72
Meischke, H; Mitchell, P; Zapka, J et al. (2000) The emergency department experience of chest pain patients and their intention to delay care seeking for acute myocardial infarction. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs 15:50-7
Brown, A L; Mann, N C; Daya, M et al. (2000) Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) study. Circulation 102:173-8
Goff Jr, D C; Feldman, H A; McGovern, P G et al. (1999) Prehospital delay in patients hospitalized with heart attack symptoms in the United States: the REACT trial. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study Group. Am Heart J 138:1046-57
Raczynski, J M; Finnegan Jr, J R; Zapka, J G et al. (1999) REACT theory-based intervention to reduce treatment-seeking delay for acute myocardial infarction. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment. Am J Prev Med 16:325-34
Zapka, J; Estabrook, B; Gilliland, J et al. (1999) Health care providers' perspectives on patient delay for seeking care for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Health Educ Behav 26:714-33

Showing the most recent 10 out of 13 publications