In this 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT), the effectiveness of two interventions approaches will be evaluated in their ability to reduce HIV drug and sex-related risk behaviors among IDUs in Ukraine. Using an intent to treat design, we propose to compare a manually-driven HIV testing and counseling intervention, the Counseling and Education (C &E) model developed during NIDA's Cooperative Agreement (Coyle 1993), with the C &E plus a network-focused intervention that is also manually-driven developed by Latkin (2003) who has agreed to be a consultant. We have assessed both interventions in Ukraine and found them to be effective in reducing risks associated with HIV. They have not, however, been compared to one another and we have not employed a RCT design in our past work. We are proposing this test because: 1. in our recently completed 5-year Ukraine study the C &E intervention alone was as effective as the C &E plus a more intensive individual model;2. this study also found that those who learned they were HIV infected when tested at baseline, regardless of intervention assignment, reduced their sex risks more than HIV negatives and those who already knew they were positive, underscoring the ethical necessity for testing and counseling and the merits of the C &E;3. nevertheless, network interventions have the advantage over individually-focused interventions, including the C &E, in their potential to affect a much wider group of injectors, specifically, those who interact with indexes. We will also assess secondary diffusion by 'first wave'network members recruiting 'second wave'network members, something that heretofore has not been done. Assessing two steps out in the network will allow us to examine diffusion, overlap, contamination, and index and network characteristics that predict diffusion and resistance to behavioral change. Both interventions are theoretically- based, manually-driven, translated into Russian and both have been implemented successfully in Ukraine. In addition, because of the high HIV prevalence among IDUs in the sites selected (ranging from 20% to 65% in our past studies), we have included partner disclosure as part of both interventions and brought in Dr. Seth Kalichman, an expert in this area, as a consultant. In collaboration with our Ukraine Co-I, Sergiy Dvoryak, M.D., Ph.D., we will recruit 2250 IDUs, 750 each from Odessa, Makeevka/Donetsk and Nikolayev, who will receive either the network-focused network intervention plus C &E or C &E alone. Participants will be recruited through street outreach, interviewed, intervened with and followed at six and 12 months. In addition to the ACASI, biological samples will be taken to be assessed for HIV and the presence of drug metabolites.
In a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and using an ACASI and biological markers, we will compare the effectiveness of two interventions in reducing HIV drug and sex-related risk behaviors among drug injectors at three sites where we have previously worked and have established relationships. The sites included in this trial were selected because they have three of the four highest numbers of drug users and HIV rates in the country (World Bank 2006;Ministry of Health of Ukraine 2008) and because of their prior demonstration in recruiting and retaining cohorts of IDUs (Booth et al., 2006b).
|Altice, Frederick L; Azbel, Lyuba; Stone, Jack et al. (2016) The perfect storm: incarceration and the high-risk environment perpetuating transmission of HIV, hepatitis C virus, and tuberculosis in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Lancet 388:1228-48|
|Booth, Robert E; Davis, Jonathan M; Dvoryak, Sergey et al. (2016) HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWIDs) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomised trial. Lancet HIV 3:e482-9|
|Booth, Robert E; Davis, Jonathan M; Brewster, John T et al. (2016) Krokodile Injectors in Ukraine: Fueling the HIV Epidemic? AIDS Behav 20:369-76|
|Corsi, K F; Dvoryak, S; Garver-Apgar, C et al. (2014) Gender differences between predictors of HIV status among PWID in Ukraine. Drug Alcohol Depend 138:103-8|
|Booth, Robert E (2013) 'Krokodil' and other home-produced drugs for injection: a perspective from Ukraine. Int J Drug Policy 24:277-8|
|Thurstone, Christian; Tomcho, Margaret; Salomonsen-Sautel, Stacy et al. (2013) Diversion of medical marijuana: when sharing is not a virtue. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 52:653-4|
|Booth, Robert E; Lehman, Wayne E K; Dvoryak, Sergey et al. (2009) Interventions with injection drug users in Ukraine. Addiction 104:1864-73|