Cellular responses to hormones and neurotransmitters can be either binary or graded, and they are usually transient. The G protein-mediated pheromone response in yeast is typical. Our central hypothesis is that mathematical techniques developed for studying stochastic processes and dynamical systems can explain the complex behaviors of cell signaling networks. The objective of this proposal is to understand the role of feedback control mechanisms used in the pheromone response pathway of yeast. Specifically, we will determine which feedback loops are responsible for maintaining the graded response, which interactions control the time-dependent dynamical response, and which interactions are important for desensitization. Our approach will be to activate the yeast pheromone signal at different points throughout the pathway, conduct a quantitative analysis of the transcription response, devise computational models that describe the observed activity, and test the validity of each model through experimentation. We will consider both deterministic models for the average protein concentration levels and stochastic models that take into account the random nature of biochemical reactions. There are three specific aims to this proposal:
Aim 1 : What is the basis for the conversion from a graded to binary response following G protein activation? We will consider three hypothetical mechanisms capable of producing a binary response: stochastic switching, bistability, and critical slowing down. We will distinguish between these models by analyzing G protein activation in individual cells and cell populations.
Aim 2 : Which pathway components downstream of the G protein moderate a graded to binary response? We will activate the pathway at points downstream of the G protein and identify additional downstream mechanisms for converting the graded response to a binary one.
Aim 3 : What is the biological function of the various feedback controls in the pheromone response pathway? Pheromone-induced or repressed proteins are likely to represent feedback regulators of the pathway. We will identify these proteins and test the consequence of altering their expression on pathway responsiveness. An integrated computational and experimental analysis of the pheromone regulation in yeast will eventually lead to improved predictive models of signaling events in more complex organisms including humans.

Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
5R01GM073180-03
Application #
7216375
Study Section
Special Emphasis Panel (ZRG1-MABS (01))
Program Officer
Dunsmore, Sarah
Project Start
2005-04-01
Project End
2009-03-31
Budget Start
2007-04-01
Budget End
2008-03-31
Support Year
3
Fiscal Year
2007
Total Cost
$260,385
Indirect Cost
Name
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Department
Biochemistry
Type
Schools of Medicine
DUNS #
608195277
City
Chapel Hill
State
NC
Country
United States
Zip Code
27599
Baker, Rachael; Wilkerson, Emily M; Sumita, Kazutaka et al. (2013) Differences in the regulation of K-Ras and H-Ras isoforms by monoubiquitination. J Biol Chem 288:36856-62
Isom, Daniel G; Sridharan, Vishwajith; Baker, Rachael et al. (2013) Protons as second messenger regulators of G protein signaling. Mol Cell 51:531-8
Baker, Rachael; Lewis, Steven M; Sasaki, Atsuo T et al. (2013) Site-specific monoubiquitination activates Ras by impeding GTPase-activating protein function. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:46-52
Hao, Nan; Yildirim, Necmettin; Nagiec, Michal J et al. (2012) Combined computational and experimental analysis reveals mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated feedback phosphorylation as a mechanism for signaling specificity. Mol Biol Cell 23:3899-910
Houser, John R; Ford, Eintou; Nagiec, Michal J et al. (2012) Positive roles for negative regulators in the mating response of yeast. Mol Syst Biol 8:586
Jones, Janice C; Jones, Alan M; Temple, Brenda R S et al. (2012) Differences in intradomain and interdomain motion confer distinct activation properties to structurally similar G? proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:7275-9
Nagiec, Michal J; Dohlman, Henrik G (2012) Checkpoints in a yeast differentiation pathway coordinate signaling during hyperosmotic stress. PLoS Genet 8:e1002437
Jin, Meng; Errede, Beverly; Behar, Marcelo et al. (2011) Yeast dynamically modify their environment to achieve better mating efficiency. Sci Signal 4:ra54
Zhu, Ming; Torres, Matthew P; Kelley, Joshua B et al. (2011) Pheromone- and RSP5-dependent ubiquitination of the G protein beta subunit Ste4 in yeast. J Biol Chem 286:27147-55
Heenan, Erin J; Vanhooke, Janeen L; Temple, Brenda R et al. (2009) Structure and function of Vps15 in the endosomal G protein signaling pathway. Biochemistry 48:6390-401

Showing the most recent 10 out of 18 publications