Agency
National Institute of Health (NIH)
Institute
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Type
Research Project (R01)
Project #
1R01HS006065-01
Application #
3371691
Study Section
(HCT)
Project Start
1989-02-01
Project End
1992-07-31
Budget Start
1989-02-01
Budget End
1990-07-31
Support Year
1
Fiscal Year
1989
Total Cost
Indirect Cost
Name
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Department
Type
DUNS #
075307785
City
Los Angeles
State
CA
Country
United States
Zip Code
90048
Morise, A P; Diamond, G A; Detrano, R et al. (1996) The effect of disease-prevalence adjustments on the accuracy of a logistic prediction model. Med Decis Making 16:133-42
Morise, A P; Diamond, G A (1995) Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of exercise electrocardiography in biased and unbiased populations of men and women. Am Heart J 130:741-7
Morise, A P; Diamond, G A; Detrano, R et al. (1995) Incremental value of exercise electrocardiography and thallium-201 testing in men and women for the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 130:267-76
Morise, A P; Detrano, R; Bobbio, M et al. (1992) Development and validation of a logistic regression-derived algorithm for estimating the incremental probability of coronary artery disease before and after exercise testing. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:1187-96
Diamond, G A (1992) Off Bayes: effect of verification bias on posterior probabilities calculated using Bayes' theorem. Med Decis Making 12:22-31
Morise, A P; Duval, R D; Detrano, R et al. (1992) Comparison of logistic regression and Bayesian-based algorithms to estimate posttest probability in patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing exercise ECG. J Electrocardiol 25:89-99
Griffin, B P; Shah, P K; Diamond, G A et al. (1991) Incremental prognostic accuracy of clinical, radionuclide and hemodynamic data in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 68:707-12
Diamond, G A (1991) Point of information. Med Decis Making 11:42-4
Diamond, G A (1991) Affirmative actions: can the discriminant accuracy of a test be determined in the face of selection bias? Med Decis Making 11:48-56